What Is Biden’s Actual Position on Court Packing?

  • 📰 NYMag
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 61 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Biden has been reluctant to say if he is considering expanding the Supreme Court, though he claimed he would provide an answer before the election

Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP/Shutterstock As part of the Biden campaign’s decision to take few risks during a general election in which he has enjoyed a commanding and lasting lead over his opponent, the candidate has refused to provide his opinion on court packing — an issue that has become much more salient following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the reality of a pending 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court.

What has Biden actually said about packing the court? During the primary last year, Biden said that he believed Democrats would “live to rue” the day they expanded the court, and later added that such a game of “political football” could “come back to bite us.” At an October 2019 debate, he provided his most direct answer up until that point: “I would not get into court packing. We add three justices. Next time around, we lose control, they add three justices.

Last week, Biden gave a near-complete answer — one that seemed to merge his opinion last year with his current hesitancy — in an interview with Cincinnati’s WKRC. “I’m not a fan of court packing, but I don’t want to get off on that whole issue. I want to keep focused.” What has Harris actually said about packing the court? Harris has had a similar turn from a concrete answer in the 2019 primary to an obscured opinion in the general. In March 2019, she told Politico that an expanded court could be a tool to help counter the Republican push to make a conservative institution out of the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. “We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” Harris said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Imbecile!! TRUMP 2020 !!!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 111. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court turns away PA GOP effort to block extended period for turning in ballotsThe Supreme Court on Monday shut down a GOP-led effort to block an extended period for counting ballots in the crucial presidential swing state of Pennsylvania.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

High court allows 3-day extension for Pennsylvania ballotsWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will allow Pennsylvania to count ballots received up to three days after the election, rejecting a Republican plea. The justices divided 4-4 Monday, an...
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Senate Republicans To Propose Constitutional Amendment Banning ‘Court-Packing’Republicans are trying to stop Democrats from expanding the Supreme Court to even out a conservative majority.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Decision on subpoena for Trump tax returns now in hands of Supreme CourtWith just over two weeks until the presidential election, a decision on whether to further delay handing over President Donald Trump's financial records to New York prosecutors now rests with the Supreme Court after Trump's attorneys argued for a stay of the 'unprecedented' document request.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump appeal of ruling against border wall fundsTrump&39;s administration appealed a lower court&39;s June 26 decision that it lacked the authority to shift the military funds toward the border project because the so-called Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution exclusively grants the power of the purse to Congress. The border wall was
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »