the state to count ballots through Nov. 13 as long as they’re postmarked by Election Day; the state is appealing.
But with so many more voters casting their ballots early this year because of the pandemic, courts are grappling with how to balance theprinciple with making sure the right to vote is protected. In the Wisconsin case, Rovner wrote that courts should not “turn a blind eye” to the reality of the pandemic and that the decision by her colleagues would disenfranchise potentially tens of thousands of voters.
“The Wisconsin Elections Commission is preparing to implement [the judge’s] orders. Because the case is still on appeal at the 7th Circuit, we have not publicized the potential extensions of voter registration and absentee ballot return deadlines. Luckily, the first deadline he extended isn’t for about a week, so hopefully the courts can get this sorted out,” Magney wrote in an email. “In March and April, many voters were confused by shifting court rulings, so we don’t want that to happen again.
“In a year where there is a very real possibility that the final presidential election result hinges on Pennsylvania, the new rules imposed by the decision of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania could destroy the American public’s confidence in the electoral system as a whole,” lawyers for the Republicans wrote.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Pennsylvania could apply to ballot counting fights in other states, but until there’s a ruling, those other cases will go forward.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: WebMD - 🏆 709. / 51 Read more »
Source: harpersbazaarus - 🏆 467. / 52 Read more »
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »