Closely held TuSimple is expanding to a 50-truck fleet in Arizona, where it has an engineering base in Tucson. Currently, all TuSimple trucks operate with two technicians in the cab though it aims to operate “driver out” within two years. in suburban Phoenix, and companies including GM’s Cruise, Uber and Lyft all plan on-demand autonomous ride services, perfecting the technology to do that in tricky urban settings is taking longer than some advocates anticipated.
In addition to potential cost-savings operating a long-haul truck without a human at the wheel, TuSimple argues that its system can cut operating costs by up to 30% , owing to fuel savings and reduced wear-and-tear on tires, brakes and other components owing to the more precise acceleration and braking its system can provide.
When UPS connected with TuSimple last year,"the UPS executive expressed skepticism in autonomy being this far along. He said the official UPS belief was that it was at least 15 years out; not even close," Price says. After that executive and a UPS team"experienced our vehicle and dug into our plans, and saw what we were doing , he changed his mind. He said 'I was a skeptic. I'm now a believer.
Previous investors in TuSimple include Nvidia, Chinese tech firm Sina Corp., Hong Kong’s Composite Capital and U.K. venture firm ZP Capital.
Fantastic article We are born to unite together we become stronger and more natural. Than when we try and do it by ourselves.
For more on TuSimple, see Robo-Rigs: The Scientist, The Unicorn And The $700 Billion Race To Create Self-Driving Semi-Trucks
the UPS employee who made this decision should be fired.
Tech Won't end well.
Tech Self driving trucks, what could go wrong? 🙄
Many things will continue to change for working class people
Will be a disaster.... Mark my words
Oh ?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »
Source: THR - 🏆 411. / 53 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »