U.S. Supreme Court's divisions in voting cases put spotlight on Barrett

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 97%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Divisions within the U.S. Supreme Court exposed in its decision preventing a deadline extension for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin indicate how new Justice Amy Barrett Coney Barrett could cast a decisive vote in similar disputes as the Nov. 3 election approaches.

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett arrives with U.S. President Donald Trump to take her oath of office to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court at a ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, U.S. October 26, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

The conservative justices indicated they are less willing to defer to the decisions of state courts. The liberal justices indicated that regardless of what court handles a case before it reaches the Supreme Court the key issue must be to protect the right to vote. Kavanaugh wrote that “under the U. S. Constitution, the state courts do not have a blank check to rewrite state election laws for federal elections.”

Gorsuch’s comments could suggest that he would vote against allowing an extension of the deadline for mail-in ballots in North Carolina in a case in which the decision by the state election board, not the legislature, is under review. In the Pennsylvania litigation, the Supreme Court was divided 4-4, which allowed the state to extend the deadline for mail-in absentee ballots by three days as long as they are postmarked by Election Day. The tie vote occurred because court was shorthanded following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

James Gardner, a University of Buffalo professor of election law, said the court, with Roberts as the decisive vote this year, has generally tried to avoid overriding state officials.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

There is no Supreme Court in the US any more. There is the Republican court and power grab.

She and Brett and Roberts know the plan is to fix elections for the GOP and phase in an apartheid state. Buckle up. Enjoy the concentration camps.

She should abstain

Disgusting if she refuses to recuse herself from voting cases during the ongoing election.

Everything about this is ILLEGAL. From start to finish. And she ADMITS IT herself. RiggedElection

You can call her ACB.

If these Republican Senators and Barrett had integrity, they would have all agreed that Stimulus Relief for tens of millions of Americans was more important than her confirmation, and would have delayed these proceedings until after the election. That would have shown character.

TheyJustCheated PayBackIsComing

US Supreme Court is now a criminal organization stealing our rights....

Oh she’s been bought and endorsed by Trump, McConnell & Republican Senators. They now own this court.

Breaking: SaudiArabia: An amount of SAR 500K /( $133K) is disbursed to the families of the deceased due to the Corona working in the gov or private health sector, whether civilian or military & whether Saudi or non-Saudi. It applies from the date of recording the 1st infection

Scary eyes

AmyConeyBarrett is AuntLydia

Please...

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Senate confirms Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court, cements 6-3 conservative majorityThe Senate on Monday night will vote to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. ...until Jan 21. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

U.S. Senate set for final vote to confirm Barrett to the U.S. Supreme CourtSenate Republicans voted to advance Supreme Court nominee judge Amy Coney Barrett toward final confirmation. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, reversed course and will now vote for Barrett despite disliking the rush toward confirmation. GarrettHaake God she is so dangerous as she does not support women in the least. GarrettHaake Packing The Court First 100 days in...besides whatever he promised. GarrettHaake She will always carry the stigma of going along with the corruption of the Supreme Court by the gop
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett's first case as Supreme Court justice could be one that decides presidential electionIf Barrett is confirmed to become a member of the highest bench in the country, one of the first cases she could hear as a new Supreme Court justice could decide who wins the White House. I don't have an opinion on the SCJ, but how come Congress can be so set in on this- but cannot get help to Americans in time of need? This political game being played BY BOTH SIDES is causing ALL OF AMERICA to lose. We need a fixed system! Sorry Amy but I'm telling you this your eyes are the most untrustful eyes that I've seen in my lifetime
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

People across U.S. wear 'Handmaid's Tale' cloaks to protest Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nominationWomen in cities across the U.S. joined the 'Red Cloak Protest'—a national effort to rally against Barrett's Supreme Court nomination. Wait until they find out that nobody gets the joke because nobody watches that crap show... Why are dems so theatrical? I guess Halloween came early
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett Confirmed to Supreme Court of U.S.Amy Coney Barrett was just confirmed to the Supreme Court of the United States, replacing the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Can’t stop looking at the herpes on her lip ... 😣
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »