U.S. Supreme Court rejects insider trading appeal by Las Vegas gambler
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear Las Vegas sports gambler Willia...Andrew Chung 3 Min Read Professional sports gambler William"Billy" Walters departs Federal Court after a hearing in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., July 29, 2016. Match interview USA-CRIME/ REUTERS/Andrew Kelly WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear Las Vegas sports gambler William “Billy” Walters’ appeal of his 2017 insider trading conviction that landed him a five-year prison sentence in a case that also drew attention because of his ties to billionaire investor Carl Icahn and golfer Phil Mickelson. Walters had asked the justices to review a lower court’s rejection of Walters’ request to have the charges thrown out because an FBI agent leaked grand jury details about the investigation to reporters. Walters, 73, was accused of using nonpublic information from former Dean Foods Co Chairman Thomas Davis about the dairy processing company and Olive Garden parent Darden Restaurants Inc to make more than $43 million in profits and avoiding losses from 2008 to 2014. In addition to his prison sentence, Walters was given a $10 million fine and ordered to forfeit about $25 million. Walters had built an estimated $200 million fortune as one of the most successful U.S. sports betters. Neither Icahn nor Mickelson was charged with wrongdoing. Mickelson, who once had gambling debts to Walters, agreed in 2016 to forfeit $1.03 million he made on Dean Foods shares to settle a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil case. Walters tried to have his indictment thrown out, saying the case was prejudiced by leaks that prosecutors conceded likely violated criminal procedural rules. Walters suggested the leaks caused Davis to cooperate with the authorities and amounted to prosecutorial misconduct. A Manhattan federal judge rejected his request, concluding that there was no basis to believe the leaks had any impact on the grand jury. The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that Walters’ argument that he had been prejudiced was “sheer speculation.” In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Walters said that a pattern of leaking by the FBI has demonstrated “systematic and pervasive” misconduct that warrants dismissal of the charges, regardless of whether any specific prejudice occurred. Reporting by Andrew Chung; Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Will Dunham Our Standards: Read more: Reuters Top News
Old white dudes just quit giving any shits about their hair. Smh
Supreme Court to hear Louisiana abortion case in first test for conservative majorityBREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to Louisiana law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. The case will be the first involving abortion for the court's new majority of justices.
Supreme Court Opens New Term With Argument on Insanity DefenseAre states required to allow insanity as a criminal defense? The question, core to a brutal Kansas case before the Supreme Court , puzzled several justices, who drew conflicting lessons from history, moral philosophy, and constitutional law. Who cares are they proven to be rehabilitated. Absolutley NOT . EXECUTION FOR MURDER realDonaldTrump you’re in luck!
Supreme Court to decide whether employers can legally fire workers because they're LGBTQLower federal courts are divided on whether existing federal civil rights law bars employers from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. If discrimination is why blacks earning are lower than some other groups why do gays earn more than most? Discrimination?
Gay, transgender rights in spotlight as U.S. Supreme Court returnsThe U.S. Supreme Court kicks off its new term this week, with a major dispute on... When Blackout Brett is impeached and thrown off SCOTUS will all the cases he illegally ruled on be thrown out too?
Guns: Supreme Court keeps New York City gun rights case on 2019 docketHi
India's Supreme Court halts tree felling for new Mumbai metroIndia's Supreme Court issued a stay order on Monday, halting the cutting of... Wrong. They hv cut all they wanted to. To prevent cutting SC should hv acted suo motu before they started cutting. Now punish the guilty if they really believe that tree cutting was wrong.