Ben Eshelman, center, loads totes with Copper River king salmon as fishermen deliver to the F/V Lucid Dream anchored near Egg Island on Thursday, May 20, 2021. In Alaska, in particular, the ruling has important implications in areas such as resource development, fisheries and the environment, areas where state leaders often clash with federal agencies.
Attorney Anna Crary, a partner at Anchorage law firm Landye Bennett Blumstein, was reviewing the court’s decision on Friday. She said it could effectively impact any federal agency decision in Alaska that is then challenged in court.“One thing is clear is that this is a significant shift in the legal structure of our country,” she said.
“We really need experts to make the decisions, and not for generalist judges to be inserting themselves,” he said.challenges of how agencies make decisions and issue regulations, such as the Biden administration’s decision on Friday to block the contentious “Our legal rights as a state should not depend on who’s in office — those rights either exist or they don’t,” he said. “The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today at least gives us a fair chance to fight back and secure the rights we were promised.”A federal agency under a future Trump administration could issue a decision approving a resource development project in Alaska.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »