WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to back stricter deadlines for workers to sue retirement plans over alleged mismanagement, ruling Intel Corp cannot avoid a suit accusing it of unlawfully making high-risk investments that cost retirement plan beneficiaries hundreds of millions of dollars.
The justices unanimously upheld a lower court decision that revived the proposed class-action lawsuit filed in 2015 by former Intel engineer Christopher Sulyma against the Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker. The justices rejected Intel’s argument that Sulyma’s lawsuit had been filed too late. Sulyma was backed by President Donald Trump’s administration in the case. Sulyma’s suit accused company retirement plans and administrators of breaching their fiduciary duty to the participants by placing an overly heavy emphasis on hedge funds and private equity, in contrast to peer funds.
Sulyma countered that while employed at Intel between 2010 and 2012 he was unaware of the alternative investments, that they performed poorly or even what hedge funds were. He said that he did not have “actual knowledge” of the alleged investment problems because he did not read the relevant documents that were only posted online.
People should be able to control their own retirement funds investments. Or, sign yearly to let the company do it for them. It's not like Intel is a government entity that can make up losses by just charging younger tax payers down the line for their investment losses.
Dayum
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Rules Border Patrol Agents Who Shoot Foreign Nationals Can't Be SuedThe U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that families of foreign nationals shot by federal agents on foreign territory have no constitutional right to sue for damages in U.S. courts. Shameful This country is over Horrifying
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court denies Mexican family's damages claim for cross-border shootingThe case had been watched closely because of President Donald Trump&39;s efforts to build a border wall and to reduce both legal and illegal immigration.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court Turns To Immigration With 2 Major CasesThe Supreme Court ruled that the parents of a 15-year-old from Mexico who was playing chicken with his friends when he was shot and killed by a U.S. border patrol agent cannot sue the officer who killed him. The Supreme Court said border patrol agents can shoot immigrants with no repercussions Disgusting. This is totally f**ked up
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Jussie Smollett Pleads With Illinois Supreme Court To Halt New Indictments Over Fake Hate CrimeAlmost two weeks after being newly indicted on felony charges arising from the alleged fake hate crime attack of January 2019, Jussie Smollett was back in court today, in more ways than one. Appear… The “former” Jussie Smollett? Did he change his name? And what the hell does “politically invoked” mean?
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Apple appeal in patent fight with VirnetXThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear Apple Inc's bid to avoid p... jimcramer ritholtz WSJ FT MarketWatch business SquawkCNBC SeekingAlpha 247WallSt WIRED MTVNEWS Gizmodo The US Supreme Court refused to hear Apple Inc’s bid to avoid paying $440 million in damages for using VirnetX Inc’s internet security technology without permission Apple dragged this out for nearly 10 years.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court turns away religious bias claim against WalgreensThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to Walgreens, turning away an appeal by a fired former Florida employee of the pharmacy chain who asked not to work on Saturdays for religious reasons as a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The justices declined to review a lower court ruling
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »