The Office of the U.S. Director of National Intelligence said in a declassified report that a natural origin and a lab leak are both plausible hypotheses for how SARS-COV-2 first infected humans. But it said analysts disagree on which is more likely or whether any definitive assessment can be made at all.
The report issued on Friday is an update of a 90-day review that President Joe Biden's administration released in August, amid intense political infighting over how much to blame China for the effects of the global pandemic rather than governments that may not have moved quickly enough to protect citizens.
Some U.S. spy agencies had strongly favored the explanation that the virus originated in nature. But there has been little corroboration and over recent months the virus has spread widely and naturally among wild animals. But one agency said it had "moderate confidence" that the first human COVID-19 infection most likely was the result of a laboratory accident, probably involving experimentation or animal handling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
I equate this to trying to prove their is a God. It only politicizes a virus. Let's focus on Pandemic response strategies. Because this pandemic has definitely showed many countries are reactive vs proactive.
China
They're other better spy agencies in the world
Волновая генетика. (RUS) Памяти русского ученого Петра Гаряева ушедшего от нас, в прошедшем году. Петр Горяев раскрывает всеобщую опасность бактерий Santy убивающих людей, созданные для транснациональной компании Бритиш Петролеум. -
usa spy agencies are spending too much time spying on USA citizens. They don’t have time to do actual work.
So they know
I entrusted shantelll_142 with my money since I took rush of investing my money with her platform, and since then I've recovered all I lost to scams. Get in touch with shantelll_142 and get a good mentorship and safe trading.
Righhhht
Translation: they know, but the truth is too big to tell.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »