AriMelber LOL
AriMelber EndOfTheRoad RIPUSA
AriMelber WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses WeWantWitnesses
AriMelber Sure he did. Sure he did. That’s why there won’t be any witnesses and the President will continue being the President and then goes for another 4 years. You dopes are still after 4 years on the wrong side of the story. Dopes.
AriMelber cover the OTHER SIDE TOO
AriMelber
AriMelber MSNBC/2016 'Hillary has a 100% chance of winning!' Oh? WHAT happened? Looks like she '100% lost!' MediaMafiaCartel FakeNewsFrauds
AriMelber Wtf with commercials over testimony? Really bad look -- thank you C-SPAN for putting our democracy before profits!
AriMelber
AriMelber Yep. This has Roger Stone sleazy corrupt influence all over it.
AriMelber The presidents team has no legal defense. Just more crying.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Alan Dershowitz on Trump defense: 'I will not make money on this'Dershowitz says he hasn't yet discussed his legal fees for defending Trump. The bigger question is who will pay Trump's lawyers. It's probably smart of him to assume Trump won't be good for the money, he has a bit of a track record It’s a Sucky job working for trump. No one gets paid and you have to do the sucking. Of course not!! Thats obvious. You didn't do any legal defending. You just said words that sound legal-ish. But for the brain wormed cultists you reached for... good chance they think lawyered bigly enough for them. As facts & truth dont matter to cultism? GetPaidInBackRubs?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Dershowitz: Trump pursuing quid pro quo to help re-election is not impeachableNEW: Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz argues in the impeachment trial that a quid pro quo that benefits the president politically is fine because all politicians believe their elections are in the public's interest, and therefore, he has no corrupt motive. Are you kidding me So can philanthropists rob banks if they plan on donating the money? THIS IS JUST CRAZY SHIT!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Dershowitz: Trump can't be impeached because he believed his reelection is in the national interestThe retired Harvard law professor said that Trump’s demand for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden is not an impeachable offense because the president was acting on the belief that his reelection is “in the public interest.” stableford Fuck! Is this the best Harvard Law School can do ? I know someone who thinks he should not have been arrested for robbing a bank, because he thought it is was in the national interest.... stableford Is he trying to Riff On Mark Twain? Is Mr. Trump 'a noisome bacillus'? stableford His re-election is not in my best interest!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Alan Dershowitz called Trump corrupt in 2016 and said he could be corrupt as PresidentLaw professor Alan Dershowitz, who is a member of President Trump's impeachment defense team, said in 2016 that he believed Trump was more corrupt than Hillary Clinton and more likely to continue being corrupt as president This man is not a trump fan, but he is a constitution fan. His argument was not “is trump guilty”, it was about was anything done that rises to the level of impeachment. The Dooche.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Trump impeachment trial live updates: Senators question House managers, Trump lawyersSchiff says Trump's conduct shows that he identifies the 'state' as being himself: 'The only way you can conceive of someone who reports wrongdoing as committing a crime against the country is if you believe that you are synonymous with the country.' ABC News: It a sad day for America that the Democrats pursue this add more drama ' wanting to remove their President from office. Who has done a far better job' than they when they were in power He would have kept they Bolton subpoena in the House - too bad he rescinded it, now he’ll have to read the book (if this idiot can even read).
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »