, but its most recent editorial is by far the most pointedly critical of political leadership. The decision to write the editorial came from “an accumulation of small things,” says the journal’s editor in chief, Eric Rubin. “Every week at our editorial meeting, something would come up, an action that the government had taken or failed to take, and every week we’d say we should write an editorial on that, or get an editorial on that.
The fact that these editorials all appeared within days of one another sends a strong message that the editorial staffs of top science journals are thinking about similar issues. I asked the three editors in chief whether there was any discussion across journals to coordinate a stand, but there wasn’t an explicit effort to join forces. Instead, it seems that the editorials grew organically out of the same concerns, which they often discussed in public forums like Twitter.
As politicians have repeatedly sidelined top scientists and ignored public health recommendations from experts, it’s no secret that scientists have become increasingly frustrated and concerned about the rise of anti-science sentiments. Skipper, Rubin, and Thorpe all spoke about the responsibility of science journals to represent the interests and voices of scientists working on the ground.
If the shoe fits, throw it at him.
Guys everybody can claim he knows it all after the fact and backseat drive the shit out of the pandemic. No one is true to himself in regard of response and how to handle it. I only accept articles and advise written and read before action where taken (close border to china)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: Mirror Celeb - 🏆 476. / 51 Read more »
Source: hellomag - 🏆 24. / 68 Read more »