that shows you the long term effects of either working or staying home. You can customize the calculator to account for your gender, age, how much you earn, how long you plan to be out of the workforce and your retirement contributions. Depending on whether or not you work outside the home, the results are either reassuring or completely depressing.that he came up with the calculator when he and his wife became parents.
For example, take this hypothetical scenario as calculated by Madowitz’s program. Say you’re a 29-year-old female who started working full time at age 25 and currently makes $40,000 a year. If you plan to take a year off to care for your child, you’ll lose $40,000 in wages. But according to the calculator taking that time off will cost you an additional $43,207 in lost retirement benefits and $57,095 in wage growth during your entire career. That’s $140,302 loss of income over a lifetime.
In short — even if you plan to go back to work at some point, taking any time off to care for your kids will cost you.increases when women become moms. Taking time off to care for your children can have a big long term impact on your lifelong earnings and retirement savings. But deciding to put your kids in childcare so you can work isn’t the clear winner here either. The annual. And don’t even get us started on the giant dose of mom judgment that gets dished out when people hear you’re “letting a stranger raise your baby.”
What we need are affordable childcare options for families and jobs that don’t view maternity/paternity leave as a strike against their employees when evaluation and promotion season comes around. And since we’re daydreaming here, universalBut none of that is likely to happen anytime soon. So whether you’re a stay at home mom or a mom who works outside the home, at least we know we’re all getting screwed together.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »