—get this—43 times,” said Ingraham last week of former Ambassador to the Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. “It sounds like this woman needs to be on a therapist’s couch, not on the witness stand.” Ingraham’s goal here is to impugn Yovanovitch’s motivations for testifying by implying, or flat-out saying, that she is primarily upset about being recalled from Ukraine, that she is a disgruntled ex-employee out for revenge against the man who fired her.
She also enjoys calling her frequent interlocutors by their surnames, in the style of high school students trying to sound tough in homeroom. “The dog is fine, Hannity,” she announced during a recent cross-talk session in which Hannity argued that the dog who tracked down ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi should get an actual medal.
“Excuse the eye roll,” she said. “Focus on the question. I know what you’re doing. Focus. Focus. Can you focus for a second, Richard?”“No, no. No no. No no. No. Richard, Richard,” Ingraham sputtered. Talking over Democratic guests under the guise of shutting down their nonsense is a Fox News tradition. It is how the network’s hosts demonstrate their strength while implying their opponents’ fundamental weakness.
Why are we talking about her? She and Fox are what is wrong with trump voters. You know, we know, they know. I’m sick of seeing her face and hearing her ignorance.
The most powerful people in the Republican Party are non-elected, rage-fueled television personalities.
So when he is not removed her viewers are going to reject that?
Well I’m guessing they were not the sharpest tools in the shed to begin with.
63 Million 2016 Republican Voters Mistrust the Impeachment, and we will Vote for Trump in 2020
When will everyone ralize that the only reason that Republicans hold on to power is because of FOX News? Republicans know it. So does Rupert Murdoch. Until Democrats find a way to neutralize the impact of FOX, they will have a hard time getting control of the government.
By stating the facts surrounding this sham impeachment process.
They don't Laura for that, do they? They already distrust it, you know, being all conspiracy-theory deep-state stuff & all that.
TishFonda Like her viewers are relevant
Haha. Reject the outcome. I’m going to reject all the times those judges had the opinion i went through a red light or was speeding.
How much do you think is her payoff worth?
I primed my lawn mower too many times and flooded it!
The summary of the transcript, prepared by Trump, states that Trump committed bribery. This is firsthand knowledge, stated by the accused (Trump). The 2 witnesses, as well as many more witnesses to come, will all state that the whistle blower letter is accurate.
The MSM, including Slate, has already accomplished that. 👍
Good. Schiffty is not trustworthy
How Slate, NBC, ABC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Vox, Huffpoo have primed their viewers to mistrust Fox News because they are afraid the viewers might learn actual facts. Why else would they be so obsessed with only 1 channel?
Anybody with a brain mistrusts the impeachment process.
Yeah, she's the one doing it
you mean, the outcome that has been planned since before trump took office? how dare she!!! ImpeachTrump ImpeachingHearings
Yep all of Fox Fake Not news DUH WHAT TOOK SO LONG TO CATCH ON?
Hell, I don't care. I have zero interest in the inner workings of mental midgets.
You meant the entire FoxNews network, right?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Fashionista_com - 🏆 474. / 51 Read more »
Source: epicurious - 🏆 114. / 63 Read more »
Source: PsychToday - 🏆 714. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: Yahoo Lifestyle - 🏆 365. / 59 Read more »