These footprints suggest coexistence of more than one type of early humans, new study says

Prints located in the African country of Tanzania belonged to an early human species, different than one previously discovered.

Australopithecus Afarensis, Human Species

12/3/2021 1:29:00 AM

Prints located in the African country of Tanzania belonged to an early human species , different than one previously discovered.

Prints located in the African country of Tanzania belonged to an early human species , different than one previously discovered.

December 2, 2021, 8:40 PM·3 min readA set of footprints found in the east African country of Tanzania from millions of years ago have long been thought to belong to a bear, but researchers have discovered they actually belonged to an ancient human species, suggesting there may have been more than one early human species existing at the same time.

The area of Laetoli in northern Tanzania is known for having fossils dating back millions of years. One site, Laetoli site G, is where the fossils of the Australopithecus afarensis have been recovered, widely regarded as one of the earliest human species walking on two legs. The famous skeleton of

"Lucy" from 3.18 million years agowas part of the Australopithecus afarensis species.However, not far from Laetoli site G, Laetoli site A had a set of footprints that appeared to be much wider than Australopithecus afarensis footprints. The prints, discovered in the 1970s, were thought to be a bear because they didn't resemble any known human species.

Laetoli A3 footprint examined by Ellison McNuttEllison McNutt, an assistant professor at the Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine at Ohio University, took interest in the "mysterious" prints because she didn't believe they belonged to a bear. McNutt's interest is understanding the evolution of human walking and why it's done on two legs.

McNutt went to a local bear sanctuary and had bears there make prints so she could compare them with the ones from Laetoli site A. The two didn't match."It's not consistent with a bear, and it doesn't appear to be consistent either with what we see in site G, which are the ones that belong to afarensis. So it seems to be a little bit more of a primitive foot," McNutt told USA TODAY.

The lead author of the peer-reviewed study published in thejournal Nature on Wednesdayexplained what makes it appear to come from a hominin – the ancestors of humans – is because of the cross stepping the prints indicate. When bears or chimpanzees attempt to cross step, it would have to be on one leg. They waddle when doing so, and cannot cross step like a model on a runway or someone trying to maintain balance.

Story continuesAs hominins began to evolve, hip muscles and the positioning of the knee allowed them to not only walk on two legs, but to maintain enough balance to cross step. The steps also included impressions for a heel and a big toe."That's how we know for sure that, one way or another, this belongs to an individual within our lineage," McNutt said.

Image of Laetoli A3 footprint (on left) and image of a cast of Laetoli G1 footprint (on right). Analysis shows similarities in length of Laetoli A3 and G footprints but differences in forefoot width with the former being wider.The team of international researchers studying the prints with McNutt came to the conclusion that although the prints are wider than the ones at site A, they most likely came from a juvenile hominin, and even full grown adults were not as big as most humans today.

Unlike "Lucy," the team isn't exactly sure when these prints were made, but analysis of it gave it a thousand year range around 3.66 million years ago. What they find remarkable is that time frame overlaps with when the Australopithecus afarensis were also roaming around.

"It's very possible that the individual who made Laetoli A could have kind of looked up across the landscape and seen an Australopithecus afarensis walking by," McNutt said. "It kind of tells us that we used to not be alone, and that our family tree used to be a lot fuller and more diverse. There wasn't just kind of one single way of being human."

Read more: Yahoo News »

NPR Cookie Consent and Choices

first liberal

NPR Cookie Consent and ChoicesThis post shows the bear footprint, not the early human one. 🥸 Harry? we need to ask the Bears opinion on this one.

The Great Myth of the Type A and Type C Personality TypesWhat a major retraction of research findings on personality types means for your health—and why open data policies could help prevent a similar incident going forward, by swhitbo

Enigmatic footprints, once thought to belong to a bear, linked to unknown human ancestorResearchers believe footprints that were previously attributed to a bear may have instead belonged to an early human ancestor that walked on two legs -- a revelation that could rewrite a chapter of the human story.

Glaxo’s Covid-19 Antibody Drug Found to Be Effective Against OmicronThe antibody treatment was effective against the variant in early laboratory studies, setting it apart from similar therapies that appear to work less well against the highly mutated strain. US Gov. NIH website 2011: 'IVERMECTIN ... immeasurable beneficial impact in improving the lives of BILLIONS of PEOPLE - being used FREE of charge ... 'wonder drug'' Can we have NEW *EUA* drugs - to ultimately market ... if there's an existing treatment? Supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Billy has his fingers in the pie everywere.

COVID-19 Antibody Drug Likely Works Against Omicron, Companies SayEarly lab studies show that a COVID-19 antibody treatment developed by GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology could be effective against the Omicron variant. Thank God 🙏🏼 Wrong it’s inorganic. The body will flush it out.

Omicron variant was spreading beyond Africa before it was identified, new evidence suggestsWorld health officials scrambled to react to the growing omicron outbreak Wednesday amid new evidence that the variant may have been spreading earlier than first detected.