At this point, it happens practically weekly. A video of a food worker or restaurant patron doing something ostensibly bad takes over TikTok, inspiring hearty debate over whether or not the particular behavior was appropriate. Back in December,after user @jayothebarber shared a clip of the establishment in seeming chaos.
In the comments, some users were quick to jump to the workers’ defense. “Clock in and help clean if you think it’s so easy to clean during a rush,” wrote one user. Even though most commenters tended to agree with that sentiment, others sided with the original poster. “How are y’all mad at the creator,” reads another comment. “We just letting businesses have zero standards now?”
TikTok’s algorithm, which served the video to thousands of viewers who have never been within a thousand miles of Port Saint Lucie, fuels an ongoing war. In the middle of all the viral dance crazes and cringey thirst traps, a near-constant argument on TikTok rages over the expectations of how people should behave in restaurants — both as workers and diners.
Ultimately, there are two, equally vocal ideological camps that emerge in this debate. First, you’ve got the people who are eager to call out what they see as unsafe or unsanitary practices, presenting it as an act of public service. And then you’ve got the folks who, whether because of their own personal experience of working in the industry or just a deep well of empathy, rise to defend workers who are shamed in viral videos.
to place raw chicken wings into a deep fryer. In the comments under the video, which has since been deleted, many were horrified, arguing that the employee should be fired for daring to touch raw chicken without gloves. There are countless examples just like these, sparking flame wars over
tiktok_us is whack
And people wonder why the food and hospitality industry has lost 60% of its workforce. Maybe stop harassing them? Maybe get rid of TikTok?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: EatThisNotThat - 🏆 294. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Fashionista_com - 🏆 474. / 51 Read more »
Source: LiveScience - 🏆 538. / 51 Read more »
Source: NatGeo - 🏆 537. / 51 Read more »
Source: SFGate - 🏆 534. / 51 Read more »