New research identifies one of the key reasons staff work when they're not well enough: they haven't met their daily work goals. The study also found that working when sick has a negative effect on work performance the following day.
That's based on an analysis of diaries kept for 15 days by 126 employees working remotely. The researchers behind the study say that it's important to manage expectations and workloads in order to protect against presenteeism, and ensure that overall productivity doesn't take a hit. "While it may seem a good idea to work despite ill health to deliver on work goals, our research shows that this has a knock-on effect for remote workers' performance on the next day as presenteeism drains employees' psychological energy, which cannot be fully recovered after work,"Study participants were gathered from a variety of professions, covering IT, teaching, finance, and other sections, and a total of 995 data points were gathered that measured physical health, work...
Considering the subsequent negative impact on work performance, as well as the risk of prolonging illnesses through a lack of rest, the study authors suggest managers should actively discourage presenteeism – and avoid it themselves. One approach could be to reduce workloads or switch tasks assigned to staff.
"If employees engage in presenteeism they should work on tasks that are inherently pleasant rather than tedious tasks that further drain their energy,"Of course, wanting to keep up with workloads isn't the only reason people don't take sick days. For many, carrying on working is simply an economic necessity – they need the money, and risk losing their positions if they don't show up.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Read more »
Source: IntEngineering - 🏆 287. / 63 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: DenverChannel - 🏆 239. / 63 Read more »
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »