The Supreme Court won't hear the Apple-Qualcomm patent case | Engadget

  • 📰 engadget
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court won't hear the Apple-Qualcomm patent case

Apple Watch, iPad and iPhone sales over allegedly infringing modem technology. The court didn't explain why it rejected the request, but a Justice Departmentfrom May argued that there was no evidence to indicate the patents were harming Apple's business.

While the companies struck a six-year licensing deal to settle their main dispute, the agreement let a US Patent and Trademark Office case continue involving the two patents. Apple lost an attempt to invalidate the patents with the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and again failed when a Federal Circuit court tossed out Apple's appeal request based on the settlement. When Apple went to the Supreme Court, the Justice Department filed its supporting brief opposing the request.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Not surprising. It doesn't involve further stripping away our rights. That's their full time job now.

They're much too busy taking our rights away one by one.

If it's not about stripping rights from unions women immigrants or lgbt folk they aren't interested.

pisa na barata

They're too busy making women have babies they don't want.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 276. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Factbox: U.S. Supreme Court takes broad view of religious rights in key casesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday issued another significant ruling broadening religious rights, siding with a Christian former public high school football coach in Washington state who sued after being suspended from his job for refusing to stop leading prayers with players on the field after games.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Apple is reportedly developing a replacement for the original HomePod | EngadgetIn his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman reports Apple is readying a new HomePod speaker that will look and sound similar to the original 2018 model.. Bert good 😊 okay play offline music please and portable After experiencing the mini I am down with a new HomePod! If that’s the case, I have two HP I can sell for $600 each! Lol
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »

Apple’s mixed reality headset may feature an M2 processor | EngadgetThe latest version of Apple’s long-rumored mixed reality headset features the company’s recently announced M2 system-on-a-chip and 16GB of RAM, according to Mark Gurman.. Given the bugs found in the M1 chip, one can only hope.
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »

Pink Addresses Supporters of Overturning Roe v. Wade: “Never F***ing Listen to My Music Again”The singer offered a strong message following the Supreme Court striking down the 1973 case that legalized abortion nationwide. Who?🤔 K; won’t- loser No problem
Source: THR - 🏆 411. / 53 Read more »

Following Roe v. Wade decision, this likely will be next controversial ruling by Supreme CourtIn a matter of days, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on a case that could have heavy environmental impact, West Virginia vs. Environmental Protection Agency.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Biden Vaccine Mandate For Federal Employees Blocked Again As Appeals Court Dissolves Earlier RulingThe 5th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the case again after previously letting the mandate take effect in April. This is ridiculous! 😡 So women have no say over their bodies but Courts say it’s ok for anti vaxxers to make everyone sick. 👎🏻 I'm so taken aback how some members of the judiciary arm are now making sensible decisions, and it undoubtedly shows that something is awfully wrong with the insistence of vaccine mandate, seeing that the vaccines don't immune anyone from contracting the virus and spreading it.🤔 There are no laws backing up these mandates
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »