The first shots have been fired in a Supreme Court showdown over web platforms, terrorism, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. On Tuesday and Wednesday, petitioners filed briefs in, a pair of lawsuits blaming platforms for facilitating Islamic State attacks. The court’s final ruling will determine web services’ liability for hosting illegal activity, particularly if they promote it with algorithmic recommendations.
Google has asserted that it’s protected by Section 230, but the plaintiffs argue that the law’s boundaries are undecided. “[Section 230] does not contain specific language regarding recommendations, and does not provide a distinct legal standard governing recommendations,” they.
There’s no complete timeline for the cases yet, but new details will emerge over the coming months; Google, for its part, has until January 12th to file a response brief. And the Supreme Court is almost certain to take up other Section 230-related cases in the next few years — including a decision on
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
Should promoting something via algorithms make companies liable for it?
Good.
Someone spear me the trouble of reading 🙏🏿🙏🏿
whoever decides the algorithm decides the course of action!!
Honestly we really need algorithmic recommendation regulations. It's a major part of why we have so many extremists.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Second Superior Court judge announces run for Pa. Supreme Court seatA second Pa. Superior Court judge has announced that she will seek the vacant state Supreme Court seat in 2023, brining the total number of candidates to three so far.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
Appeals Court Rules Against Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan—Likely Sending Second Case To Supreme CourtThe ruling will likely leave it up to the Supreme Court to ultimately decide the program’s fate. Come on man This was a lie from the beginning. He knew it would not stand and that he never had the authority. Kürt halkının anlamadılar barşi geçti artık ☝️👁️☝️💥 merhamet beklemeyin benden ✋ elmelik ölüm oseçti Kürt olmak şereftir insanlıktır bu kadarı zalim Bir dünya,(isayı da)iyi düşünün günü gelir gördüm der gibisinden konuşuru ? güneş ☝️👁️☝️👁️
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Court sides with doctor in lawsuit claiming mother-to-be was given C-section without anesthesiaIn 2018, Oceanside couple Delfina Mota and Paul Iheanachor sued Tri-City Medical Center, the surgeon and the anesthesiologist
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
DOJ warns Supreme Court immigration case could allow states to sue over 'virtually any policy'Justices on the Supreme Court appeared concerned Tuesday about the prospect of allowing states to sue the Biden administration over one of its immigration policies, and the Justice Department warned doing so could allow states to 'sue the federal government about virtually any policy.' Maybe that would be a good thing. Especially when the federal government exceeds its tenth amendment limitations. Good. The people have the right to curtail government. Especially at the bureaucratic level not subject to direct election. I’d be OK with that
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court likely to toss conviction of ex-Andrew Cuomo crony Joe PercocoThe US Supreme Court appears poised to overturn the corruption conviction of a former top aide to ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in a pair of “pay-to-play” fraud schemes. Another Preet Bharara conviction overturned. Terrible US Attorney.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »