Photo: Bobby Doherty David Shor is a 28-year-old political data analyst and social democrat who worked for President Obama’s reelection campaign. On May 28, Shor tweeted out a short summary of a paper by Princeton professor Omar Wasow. The research compiled by Wasow analyzed public opinion in the 1960s, and found violent and nonviolent protest tactics had contradictory effects.
Trujillo Webster repeated the accusation of racism , and then tagged Dan Wager, the CEO of Civis Analytics, the firm employing Shor, “Come get your boy.” Both American public opinion and many institutions have moved left on race and gender during this time. It is a positive change opening humane new possibilities for reform, but it has come along with some illiberal side effects. Over the last few weeks, as protests against the murder of George Floyd produced outrageous brutality against protesters, the good primary effect and the bad side effect seem to have advanced rapidly in tandem.
This tweet, a breach of the same norm against criticizing violent protests that Shor violated, provoked a bitter back-and-forth on Twitter with Akela Lacy, a highly regarded fellow investigative reporter at the Intercept. The Intercept’s social-media policy “encourages staff members to address disagreements directly with colleagues rather than airing them publicly” but does not flatly prohibit it.
Fang’s interview subject probably lacks familiarity with the history of this issue being used as an excuse for racism, and almost surely didn’t realize the cruel resonance of the phrase “black-on-black crime.” Still, he was not arguing for focusing on violent crime as an alternative to demanding reform, but as an addition to the agenda of a movement he supports.
A journalist friend of Fang’s told me he felt his career was in jeopardy, having been tried and convicted in a court of his peers. He was losing sleep for days and unsure how to respond. “All of us were trying to protect his job and clear his name and also not bow to a mob informed by an attitude that views that you disagree with are tantamount to workplace harassment.”
Most oddly, owner A.G. Sulzberger expressed dismay at the op-ed’s “contemptuous” tone. His assumption that the page is normally a contempt-free zone might come as a surprise to many of its columnists and their readers. Journalism professor Jay Rosen has an essay connecting the backlash against Cotton to a more longstanding goal to push the Times leftward.
jonathanchait
jonathanchait no
jonathanchait 123,045
jonathanchait Little late for that amiright
jonathanchait They let Chait out of the hospital?
jonathanchait
jonathanchait Hey, is there some reason that Chait spelled Trujillo Wesler's name wrong twice and also did zero context-building on her also being a data analyst who worked for an Obama campaign?
jonathanchait Literally HOW does this man still have the opportunity to have his rambling rants published online? Union there are so many young thoughtful writers out there who could use this space in a productive way. jonathanchait step aside today!!
jonathanchait
jonathanchait I read this as “we still need liberal moms” which is also true
jonathanchait 🌽
jonathanchait 🌽
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: papermagazine - 🏆 409. / 53 Read more »
Source: billboard - 🏆 112. / 63 Read more »