The expansion of Heathrow airport is scotched on climate grounds

  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 66 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 92%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Greens have opposed a third runway on grounds of climate, noise, air pollution and economic growth. They have won a big victory

climate agreement, forged in 2016, has not made a huge difference to the world so far. But on February 27th it got its biggest break yet: the Court of Appeal in London found against the government and in favour of a coalition of groups that oppose the expansion of Heathrow Airport on grounds of climate, noise, air pollution and economic growth. The court said that the government should have taken the Paris agreement into account. The government is not going to appeal.

After a decade of lobbying by business, the government embraced the third-runway scheme in 2016. Chris Grayling, transport secretary at the time, said in a witness statement that the Paris agreement was “not relevant” to the scheme: the government had assessed it under a previous agreement. But that agreement was less stringent than the Paris one.

The decision does not put an end to airport expansion: it leaves room for the government to go back to the drawing board and come up with a plan that takes the Paris agreement into account. Businesses will argue passionately that airport expansion is essential to the growth that the government needs in order to finance its expensive schemes to build infrastructure elsewhere in the country.

But if there is to be airport expansion, there is a good chance now that it will not happen at Heathrow. Boris Johnson has long been a passionate opponent of the third runway, famously promising when he was mayor of London to “lie down in front of those bulldozers and stop the construction”. During the election campaign, he said that he would “find some way” to block it.

Mr Johnson is not, by and large, an enthusiast for judicial activism. But with this controversial judgment, the Court of Appeal may have done him a favour.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Is run out of Cuba? They seem to be against economics.

JonnyVamExplore Wasn't it the Greens that opposed burning off waste land in Australia, causing the current disasters?

alllibertynews Judges yet again making political decisions and the lefty/Liberal cannot accept any decision they do not like

Cool story bro.

MONEY , MONEY ! The most powerful governments in the world cannot prevent a virus from spreading ... But they say they can change the temperature of the earth if you pay MORE TAXES .

Meanwhile, the Portuguese environment agency allowed a new airport to be built in Lisbon while endangering a rare bird species justifying it with economic reasons. Great stuff!

And the Economist again proves how irresponsible it is for touting this 'victory' which will impact nothing whilst China and India build airports by the dozens. You really have to wonder how far this rag will fall.

(a7walanimals )

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Expansion of Britain's Heathrow Airport ruled illegal on climate groundsIn a victory for climate change campaigners, the planned expansion of London's Heathrow Airport was declared unlawful by a UK court on environmental grounds What is the second biggest PONZI SCHEME in this world? GLOBAL WARMING (aka Climate Change). Hope they all had a safe drive home afterwards. 👍 😳Ok 💩just got real!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Climate campaigners win appeal against Heathrow expansionThe British government had not sought permission to appeal the ruling in the supreme court, the judge said, meaning that it could now either rework the policy or choose to scrap the project.
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »

Campaigners win court challenge to block Heathrow expansionCampaigners have won a court ruling to block the controversial plans for a third runway at Heathrow Airport on environmental grounds.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Top Republican Rejects Climate Denialism, Urges Expansion Of Nuclear Power And Natural GasRepublican leaders are urging an expansion of nuclear energy and natural gas to address climate change We will all remember in the days ahead the Republican denialism up to this point. We must all own up to our failures in life in a true meritocracy. This is a half assed solution. The rest of the world is going away from nuclear and natural gas produced energy and is going toward renewable energy sources like solar and wind powered. This guy is 20 years behind the times. It's funny because what we're witnessing is exceeding scientists models. It's worse than what scientists have been saying. Happening at a more rapid pace. Republicans continue to be the party that denies climate change exists. They lost their minds years ago.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Citing Climate Commitments, U.K. Court Blocks New Runway At Heathrow AirportThe Court of Appeal said the major international hub's plans for an additional runway failed to consider the government's pledges on carbon emissions. It's a big win for climate activists. LHR only has *two* runways? How is that possible? DEN (Denver) has six, and it's a large airport for sure but not an international hub like LHR. GOOD 💚💚 Because having the planes fly around until a runway is available is better for the environment. Got it. Seems like you'd want to get them onnyhebground and kill the engines as quickly as possible.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »