The Texas Supreme Court on Friday rejected the claim that medical exceptions to the state’s abortion law are confusing, instead placing the onus on doctors to follow the law as written and on the state medical board to provide guidance.
“This case comes to us as a direct appeal from a temporary injunction stopping enforcement of Texas’s abortion laws in various circumstances,”The plaintiffs include women who suffered serious complications during their pregnancies—situations filled with immense personal heartbreak. The State does not contest that at least some of these complications present life-threatening conditions for which an abortion may be indicated.
The state’s high court ultimately found that doctors did not prove the state’s Human Life Protection Act to be unconstitutional because it contains exceptions for the life of the mother and for serious injury. More specifically,she first suffer physical impairment. Rather, Texas law permits a physician to address the risk that a life-threatening condition poses before a woman suffers the consequences of that risk.
“The further the medical community goes in undertaking this sensitive task now, the better-equipped courts will be to objectively evaluate a physician’s conduct in the future,” she wrote.
Source: Healthcare Press (healthcarepress.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: cbsaustin - 🏆 595. / 51 Read more »
Source: TheCut - 🏆 720. / 51 Read more »
Source: WGAL - 🏆 331. / 59 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »