, a law that protects trademark holders if another product is believed to cause confusion among consumers about its origin and whether it's associated with the known trademark.that the clearly humorous product was protected by the First Amendment.
For works of artistic expression, it must be proven that use of the trademark is irrelevant to the work, and that the creator is intentionally misleading consumers into believing the trademark holder is involved. Since that could not be proven in the case of the dog toy, the Ninth Circuit court ruled that it was protected by the First Amendment.
"The Bad Spaniels dog toy, although surely not the equivalent of the Mona Lisa, is an expressive work," Judge Andrew Hurwitz wrote in the ruling. Arguments on the case are set to be heard by the Supreme Court Wednesday, and a decision is expected later this year.Sign up for notifications from Insider! Stay up to date with what you want to know.
Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)
Good on them trying to protect their trademark etc. Could be the dog toy creator is just looking for a payout!
I’d definitely get them confused and drink the dog toy.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
DOJ appeals to Supreme Court after court invalidates domestic violence restraining order gun banThe Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to allow a federal ban on gun ownership for individuals under domestic abuse retraining orders to stand. The DOJ is full of corruption. Just like Garland is full of corruption. This just another attempt to Garb guns away from American citizens that follow the Law. I believe that guns should be regulated and not allow just anyone to possess a gun
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court asked to decide if AI can be a patent 'inventor'A computer scientist who has waged a global campaign for patents covering inventions conceived by his artificial intelligence system asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to hear his case. Huh? The people who program the AI will get credit for patents. Da fuck we cannot start giving AI US rights. Uneffingbelievable
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
US asks Supreme Court to uphold domestic violence gun lawThe U.S. Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to allow a federal law stand that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to own firearms. harmony World 🌍 futuristic Julia Naimbale&soulmatelover Gary Nekongo&allourchildren from Namibia 🇳🇦 including girl in Düsseldorf Germany 🇩🇪 wesay the president& his networkretiredpresident in Namibia 🇳🇦 are involvedinattemptedmurder by hugetrucks, poisoning, gunpoint robbery Incredible that it has to be asked. Why is it that criminals can’t vote, but it’s ok for them to get firearms. No right is absolute according to previous Supreme Court decisions, aka the yelling fire in a movie house.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
His Words Were So Terrifying the Supreme Court Got InvolvedBilly Raymond Counterman eventually wound up in prison after stalking a musician and sending threatening messages. Now he’s claiming it’s a First Amendment issue.
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court remembering Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a champion for women’s rights whose death ahead of the 2020 election allowed the Supreme Court to become more conservative, was remembered during ceremonies Friday at the high court. Unfortunately her legacy is tainted by her decision to not retire. Thanks, Ruth, for holding onto the seat for Trump to fill. Only good thing you did on the court you standard issue liberal hack.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »
Supreme Court's 'Gideon' ruling at 60 and the right to counsel: In their own wordsSaturday, March 18, 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright that criminal defendants have a right to a lawyer. Time to PRAY, not protest It is in the Miranda rights.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »