Supreme Court to hear case that threatens existence of consumer protection agency

  • 📰 NPR
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court has agreed to take up a case that could threaten the existence of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — and potentially the status of numerous other agencies, including the Federal Reserve.

Although the agency reports regularly to Congress and is routinely audited, the Fifth Circuit ruled that is not enough. The CFPB's money has to be appropriated annually by Congress or the agency, and everything it does is unconstitutional, the lower courts said.

"This marks the first time in our nation's history that any court has held that Congress violated the Appropriations Clause by enacting a law authorizing spending," wrote the Biden administration's Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar.Conservatives who have long opposed the modern administrative state have previously challenged laws that declared heads of agencies can only be fired for cause.

The CFPB was the brainchild of then White House aide, and now U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren. She issued a statement Monday noting that lower courts have previously and repeatedly upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Author Sutton explained in his book Wall Street and FDR that Federal Reserve is an private banking monopoly

End the Fed!

Term limits should be on the forefront of our next election

The article is incomplete and misleading. Read the WSJ article on the topic for more details and a deeper understanding of the question before the court which NPR missed.

HowMuchSawdustCanYouPutInRiceKrispiesBeforePeopleNotice.jpg

I don't know the actual law governing the CFPB but consumers have been raked over the coals by the unregulated stock market and advertising. Republicans deregulated and allows beyond truth advertising. Like the election deniers.

SCOTUS is a fringe extremist group at this point.

Good.

SCOTUSblog Four easy reasons to abolish the federalreserve along with its cronies and then abolish yourselves, 9 non-elected people should NOT decide laws for 300M USA citizens! USTreasury SecYellen GaryGensler SECGov CFTC RepMaxineWaters WhiteHouse

The only agency that actually helped protect the people from financially shady dealings. Not surprised it is at risk of being thrown out for corporate interests. I am sure supreme court would throw out the fda, epa, ntsb so trains can just derail all the dllive long day.

We need to end the Fed!

Gonna go back to the days of sawdust in beef and dirt mixed in the coffee grounds.

Bring it down.

Their goal is to destroy the regulatory state. Look at Ohio for what happens when that happens. Because Republicans value power and $$$ before human beings.

The Federal Reserve is actually part of the problem, as in never ending cycle of debt. IMO anyway. The CFPB needs to be protected for the consumers.

Lol...

One can hope.

You are lying about the reasoning

The federal reserve should have been abolished long time ago

CFPB doesn't have any teeth anyway...just pretty dentures

I’m looking forward to the court tossing out the National Firearms Act. They’ve clearly been building to it. And I won’t cry if they close several federal government departments lol

Look at all the crazies who say how great 'federal agencies' are that are accountable to no one and limitless in power. This article was a great spin on how authoritarianism = freedom and limits = tyranny. The supreme court is 'extreme' in how it limits 'government' power 🙄

Sounds like a chance for the SC to royaly screw something else up. My suggestion is cut their budget by 25% a yr until they get in line.

Don't seem like that agency did to much. Hahahah

Dismantle the United States. The whole goal of trumplicants

Wish they’d take up a case showing the IRS has no authority

Now that the NeoCons pwn SCOTUS, I hope that they continue to take down all the government agencies and regulations. At some point, the Democrats are either going to wake up and actually DO something about it, or fade into complete obscurity.

Dems and their federal agencies…

Glad to see. We need to shut these agencies down. They’re useless and accomplish nothing.

Set Fed Funds rate to the 2 yr treasury…. And turn off the lights.

For everyone blaming Trump. Biden entered politics same year we went off gold standard. In 50yrs he over saw $250,000 of debt per taxpayer. You each owe that much!

Let's guess how the Vatican Six will vote

Consumers are better off having no reason to assume the fed gov is protecting them (because it’s not).

Good. We need to get rid of several of these worthless three letter agencies & reduce the skyrocketing national debt.

The federal reserve system of banking that has pretty much devalued our dollar by 95%. And the problem with this is?

This movement has been building a loooong time. Get ready for their BS. The Anarchists

AM_McCarthy JFC. SenateDems HouseDemocrats potus VP SenWarren katieporteroc StopThem!

CFPB is probably the best federal agency in existence. They literally help the disenfranchised.

Why don't the Republicans send those reactionaries a case to declare Social Security unconstitutional? Maybe after SCOTUS does that, enough people will revolt to bring about court reform. Term Limits ExpandTheCourt EthicsForSCOTUS

This needs to happen!

Trump: the gift that keeps on giving

IanDon Given that a huge portion of the Supreme Court's job is to preserve the separation of powers, and the CFPB is basically unaccountable to anyone anywhere except itself, it's long overdue. And it's not as if it's gone unnoticed, either.

Oops

Too much power in US Supreme Court and too little integrity in GOP presidents and members of Senate who appoint and approve. Need Constitutional amendment method to limit terms and make removal easier.

Why? There is no reason to hear this case. What a fking joke this court has become

Don’t get our hopes up.

We not surprised

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 96. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Justice Thomas Moore Has Personal Experience With Student LoansThe Supreme Court won’t have far to look for a personal take on the “crushing weight” of student debt that underlies the Biden administration’s college loan forgiveness plan. Thomas Moore? He'll still vote against any relief. That's the kind of person he is. Take a little lookie loo at his wife and her lovely persona.
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear GOP state challenge to pandemic-related Biden student loan debt relief planThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments Tuesday pertaining to GOP-led states aiming to block President Biden's student debt forgiveness plan. When Biden was a Sen. He made a law that students could NOT write off school debit during bankruptcy. Universities supported this. After that, Universities and college started raising tuition to go to school. If some decides to go to school. They pay the bill, not the public
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Who are the attorneys fighting Biden's costly student loan relief at the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Feb. 28 in two cases to decide the fate of President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness program. It's a bailout. Call it a bailout. Due diligence on the judges a must. Just Say NO .
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court’s Student-Loan Case Will Test Limits of Presidential PowerArguments begin Tuesday over the Biden administration’s roughly $400 billion plan to forgive federal student debt for tens of millions of borrowers, giving justices an opportunity to set strict limits over the president’s ability to implement policies without explicit authorization from Congress. NO. Next question? absolutely NOT This case has to do with constitutional limits on which branch of the government can initiate spending….. nothing else…..
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Social media needs to be policed — just not by the Supreme CourtSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan drew laughs last week when she said about herself and her colleagues, “You know, these are not like the nine greatest... 😂 That's what they all say...those who want to be the proxies of the government that are used to spy on citizens and squelch their free speech. It's the same group which used to tell 'keep the internet free!' It wasn't , it isnt, and without regulation, it won't be in the future No government should not control any social media!! Dallas Morning News actively calling for censorship. Worst opinion pieces I’ve ever seen.
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »