Supreme Court to decide how much authority state legislatures have over elections

  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

In any other era, the Supreme Court’s upcoming case on who holds the final say on election rules would be largely confined to the pages of law review journals and back rooms of state legislatures.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 235. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracy, focused on power of state legislatures | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during electionsThe court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court. State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution. You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo. Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs case on state legislatures' power over federal electionsThe Supreme Court is about to confront an elections case that could dramatically alter voting and significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency. It’s where the power was always intended to be: with the states. Dems just want more central control and a huge federal government. really doesn't get it do they? It should be the power of the states the whole time. Who is running their twitter? At least read the Constitution first 😂 The Constitution gives state lawmakers full power over elections. This should come as no surprise as the federal government was created by states when they ratified the constitution. States wouldn't have signed on to federal intervention in state elections.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Rights of same-sex couples, state lawmakers on the line at Supreme CourtThe rights of same-sex couples and state legislatures are on the line this week at the Supreme Court. Two major cases will be heard that could have major implications nationally. Here we go... No one should be required to create or make something that is generally considered profane or objectionable in their religious or cultural belief system. They should have to make or service something they usually do even for people who practice things against their beliefs. Freedom of religion . Fair elections
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court hears clash between LGBTQ and business owners' rightsThe case involves a Colorado web designer who says state law prevents her from designing wedding website because she believes that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs web designer’s refusal to work on same-sex weddingsThe Supreme Court will hear the latest clash between religious conservatives and LGBTQ rights as it weighs a conservative evangelical Christian web designer's bid to avoid working on same-sex weddings. Masterpiece Bake Shop won, didn't they? That would be precedent. But it's dumb not to work on same sex weddings...they are good clients who refer lots of business. Trump should use this firm for the MAGA material. Then sue them if they refuse The court will probably side with Christians given their bias but that still doesn’t make you an awful person for doing this.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »