Supreme Court to Consider Protections for Immigrants Seeking Asylum After Entering U.S.

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 13 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court will consider protections for immigrants seeking asylum after entering the U.S.

Court to consider Trump administration appeal of decision giving asylum seekers more legal protection from quick removal*High Court to Consider Trump Administration Appeal of Decision Giving Asylum Seekers More Legal Protection from Quick Removal.

Court to consider Trump administration appeal of decision giving asylum seekers more legal protection from quick removal*High Court to Consider Trump Administration Appeal of Decision Giving Asylum Seekers More Legal Protection from Quick Removal

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The Flores decision is why families were separated in the 1st place... 20 days is not long enough for the volume of illegals crossing and was widely taken advantage of... 90+% did not qualify for asylum... Keep families together till court up to 365 days should be enough!

Oh, they make the law now, hmm? What is Congress for?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Brazil Supreme Court ruling could free corruption convicts, including LulaBrazil's Supreme Court began debating on Thursday whether to overturn a thr... Keep him locked up! Brazil is much better off without him poisoning the country. jairbolsonaro is the best president they've ever had. What Reuters is trying to say is that 'Brazil Supreme Court ruling may find Lula was WRONGFULLY convicted' Se soltarem o Lula-thief o EXÉRCITO BRASILEIRO vai agir ou vai começar uma WAR-CIVIL, A suprema corte é composta de juízes corruptos indicado por ex:president thief.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court will hear challenge to Consumer Financial Protection BureauA decision in the case is likely by the end of June, meaning that the fate of the regulator will be announced in the middle of the 2020 presidential campaign.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Considers D.C. Sniper’s Parole BidD.C. sniper Lee Boyd Malvo’s hopes for a chance at parole reached the Supreme Court, where the inmate’s lawyer argued that his sentence of life imprisonment was imposed without consideration of factors the justices later held were necessary when punishing juveniles. Ah NO They terrorized Baltimore. Keep him in prison. Lock him up throw away the key
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Weighs State Identity-Fraud Charges Against Immigrant Job SeekersThe Supreme Court on Wednesday explored whether states can prosecute undocumented immigrants for identity theft when they provide false social security numbers or other information when applying for jobs. It's still fraud and it should be prosecuted. *illegal FIFY So...we are Nazi Germany now! And Trump is Fuhrer, ah? This can come up because children are in cages!
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court debates life without parole sentence in DC sniper caseThe Supreme Court wrestled with the sentence of life without parole in the DC sniper case, discussing the impact of their own prior cases as well as the details concerning Virginia's sentencing scheme When i was 8 or 9, no one could have convinced me to do what he did. Sorry. Sentences (usually) should stick and not leave victims wondering if 'one day.'
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court divided over Kansas immigrant identity theft caseThe U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared divided over the legality of Kansas... Why aren’t the feds prosecuting the fraudulent use of the SSN? Why did the state have to do something? State officials highlight the precedent of allowing 'unlawful workers' exemption from state prosecutions. The Feds don't want to prosecute & they don't want the states to prosecute either. So ID theft is illegal if you are a citizen & okay if you are not. No wonder outsiders think US law is a joke.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »