The Supreme Court on Monday took up job discrimination cases that could for the first time resolve at a national level whether lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workers can be fired based on their identity.
The Trump administration has argued before the Supreme Court that Title VII does not apply to LGBT individuals. Meanwhile, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which is also a part of the administration, maintains the opposite stance. Last term, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to hear a case on the issue but declined.
Jason Habinsky, a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the New York office of Haynes and Boone, said that a ruling granting protection to LGBT employees would not affect many companies who already have policies in place shielding them from discrimination. For other companies, he said, it could be a wake-up call.
The sexual orientation cases concern two employees who argue that they were fired for being gay. In one case, Altitude Express v. Zarda, No. 17-1623, Donald Zarda, who was a skydiving instructor, sued his former employer and alleged that he was fired because of his sexual orientation. That case had the opposite result as Zarda's at the appellate level. Bostock's case was dismissed by a federal district court in Atlanta, and that dismissal was later affirmed by a panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
when u get fired play the gender card! its like the race card and rape card!
If this passes employers won't hire LBGTQ people to begin with because it would be impossible to fire them.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
F-word: Supreme Court struggles with law blocking trademark protection in cases of vulgarityThe Supreme Court expressed disdain for the public display of vulgarity Monday, but seemed reluctant to use federal trademark law against it. Today DONALD J. TRUMP Announced...that we'll be offering 401(k)s to all of our employees tomorrow. We are doing what the tax cuts were meant to do as a small business to compete against big business: invest in our people, invest in growth.' — Small Business Owner Carlos Gazitua Good.. If this jerk had any sense of decency, he wouldn't use this language in the first place! Shame on him and the moral corruption he espouses. cnn maddow MSNBC ap USSupremeCourt bbb_us HouseDemocrats SenateDems ABC 60Minutes CBSNews ChurchNewsroom USCCB NRFnews
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Opinion | Tensions on the Supreme Court are spilling into viewOpinion: Tensions on the Supreme Court are spilling into view pack the court Completely inevitable.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects death row appeal over anti-gay jurorThe US Supreme Court is again rejecting a gay death row inmate's appeal that claims jurors in South Dakota were biased against him because of his sexual orientation. Good. This is wrong ,the F jurors were baisad, & that is why they questioned the judge about men's jail & gay marriage. This supreme courts is too conservative which almost make them baisad on some of their rullings. This is not America. Yes, that's why.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court debates whether FUCT clothing line can trademark its nameThe Supreme Court heard a lively argument Monday on whether the 1st Amendment’s protection for the freedom of speech extends to words and symbols that the government’s trademark office views as “scandalous.”
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Chevron says Dutch Supreme Court rejects Ecuador's $9.5 billion claimThe Supreme Court of the Netherlands dismissed Ecuador's attempts to annul ... Chevron says, 'We're an oil company - we shit where we want'. Legal entities look at their pension investment portfolios and agree!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects death row appeal over anti-gay jurorSupreme Court again rejects gay death row inmate's appeal that claims jurors in South Dakota were biased against him because of his sexual orientation. sad, 2, say' but it's probably,.....true! No buddy, they were biased against you because you killed someone Omg everyone wants to blame everyone else but themselves..greats wat to get a retrial claim your gay ...I swear
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court declines to take up First Amendment case brought by rap artistThe Supreme Court declined Monday to take up the case of rapper Jamal Knox, who argued he was sent to prison for a song that was protected by the First Amendment. 🤷🏻♀️ Although this may be true, you can’t convey illegal things to your followers, that should be illegal. But if all there evidence was based on the song you should have not been jailed
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Allergan bid to use tribe to shield drug patentsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cast aside pharmaceutical company Allergan Plc&... Wow these companies will do anything for money smh
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
India's Supreme Court considers call to open mosques to womenIndia's Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to consider a petition from a Musli... On that report about a 5 year old 'falling' off a 3rd floor in a mall... you forgot to say that the BLACK man PUSHED that 5 year OLD WHITE boy. I'm mexican and i don't like the preference you are giving a group just to not upset far leftist. I'm an Obama Democrat- a centrist. India’s SC same rule on Hindu temples have fallen on deaf ears. It took a right-wing Hindu government to fix all the political correctness bullshit from 3 decades of Liberal governance. It's time to stop pleasing the minority and apply the same standards to them as the majority of the country.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
The Supreme Court scrutinises a bar on “scandalous” trademarksA clothing brand with a tasteless name gets its day in court alllibertynews I have a DIG BICK
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Should we expand the Supreme Court?Commentators say a knockdown battle over every open Supreme Court seat is demoralizing for the country and cements the perception of the court as a political body. There have been a number of Supreme Court reform proposals discussed over the years. Merrick Garland was a true American hero and his memory will live on. The precedent was set. Presidents don’t pick a Supreme Court Justice with less than a year in office. The Dems knew they would lose so that is why they are so bitter. Have a better lead in next time & maybe you won’t get a Trump. Dem Joe Biden rule was used as precedent to not confirm Garland - if you are a Dem, and a Dem makes the rule that is abided by - doesn’t get any fairer than that!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »