that Harvard and UNC's admissions programs violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters, FILEThe vote was 6-3 in the UNC case and 6-2 in the Harvard case, due to the recusal of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Jackson had served on the board of overseers at Harvard, where she earned her undergraduate and law degrees.
"Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points," Roberts wrote. "We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today."
The court said that it has "permitted race-based admissions only within the confines of narrow restrictions. University programs must comply with strict scrutiny, they may never use race as a stereotype or negative, and -- at some point -- they must end."
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects controversial Trump-backed election law theory | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court said Tuesday that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not violate the elections clause of the US Constitution when it invalidated the state’s 2022 congressional map
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court justices rule state lawmakers do not have exclusive control over elections in key decisionThe Supreme Court ruled in a major elections case that could affect voting boundaries, mail-in ballots, and more forthe 2024 election and beyond.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects independent state legislature theory in major election law caseBREAKING: The Supreme Court declined to limit the authority of state courts to nullify federal election rules set by state legislatures.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »