The other four conservative justices dissented Thursday. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the decision forces “Alabama to intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly proportional to the black share of the State’s population. Section 2 demands no such thing, and, if it did, the Constitution would not permit it.
The case stems from challenges to Alabama’s seven-district congressional map, which included one district in which Black voters form a large enough majority that they have the power to elect their preferred candidate. The challengers said that one district is not enough, pointing out that overall, Alabama’s population is more than 25% Black.
Louisiana’s congressional map had separately been identified as probably discriminatory by a lower court. That map, too, remained in effect last year and now will have to be redrawnPartisan politics underlies the case, and in a closely divided House of Representatives Thursday's ruling could have a significant effect.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: dailyherald - 🏆 317. / 59 Read more »
Source: WTVYNews4 - 🏆 590. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
Source: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Read more »