Supreme Court rules for black death row inmate over prosecutor's racial bias

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

US Supreme Court has reversed the conviction of a Mississippi death row inmate who said the state prosecutor repeatedly kicked black people off the jury each time he was tried for the same murders.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday reversed the conviction of a Mississippi death row inmate who said the state prosecutor repeatedly kicked black people off the jury each time he was tried for the same murders.

The decision was a victory for Curtis Flowers, who is black. He was tried six times for the 1996 murder of four furniture store employees in Winona, Mississippi where he had recently worked. Of the first five trials, one conviction was thrown out over questions about evidence and two resulted in mistrials.

Kavanaugh said that in the six trials combined, the prosecutor moved to strike 41 of the 42 black prospective jurors and"engaged in dramatically disparate questioning of black and white prospective jurors."When a jury is being selected, lawyers for each side are allowed to exclude a certain number for potential bias or other cause. But they are also allowed to make peremptory strikes, which require no explanation.

When the case was argued in March, Justice Clarence Thomas broke his three-year courtroom silence by asking a few questions. He wanted to know if the defense lawyers used any peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors. Told that they did, Thomas asked,"And what was the race of the jurors struck there?" The answer: only whites.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

its always the raceesism and the gullible libidiots eat it up

Yea!

Anyone notice that NBC only does divisive stories anymore?

That’s the Deep South for you. No surprises there.

Amazing stuff.

Wow 😮, justice, how I have missed thee!

Good news

Something really stinks in America..and it’s racism..such people must be denied the right to exist, Period

This is a dilemma. It's not justice if not applied the same across the board, regardless of race. However, he could be guilty? I stick by the preceding statement. 10 guilty men should go free before 1 innocent man is convicted. True statement.

Justice was not blind and blatantly bigoted for years with this case. The White prosecutor should be jailed for incompetency, racism & he should be disbarred! Bravo to the SCOTUS for righting a horrible injustice!

DISGUSTING!!! Back to The Jim Crow South.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Bolsonaro’s Conservative Agenda Is Tested in Brazilian Supreme CourtWhen Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro took office in January, he promised to defend what he calls traditional-family values, loosen gun laws and push the nation to the right after decades of mostly leftist rule. But six months into Mr. Bolsonaro’s administration, the Supreme Court is proving to be a powerful obstacle to his conservative agenda. Going to the right is the only solution to the countries significant problems, most rational people from Brazil would agree. Socialism is not yet viable in such a country... too much violence, illegal activity and corruption at all levels of society. You need pure capitalism... build a country up before you slowly improve the social safety nets and benefits to a sustainable and responsible level. Six month of nothing!
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court bolsters rights for developers and property owners in California and elsewhereThe Supreme Court’s conservative majority gave a major boost to property rights, ruling that developers and landowners may go directly to federal court and seek compensation for a “taking” of their property. I can't wait to read the comments on this one.... Surprised you didn’t put the quotes around “their” VP Really, how? Try asking them, use my name if you want. I'm going to 'Somehow' prove in court that a NYS cop stole all of my $$s, papers and property...without 1st a method of my having rights to $$s, papers or properties and 'The State', not having them?(King Ramses died)
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court set to decide major census, electoral maps casesThe U.S. Supreme Court, approaching the end of its current term, is due to issue... Grow a Spine & stand up for the Constitution, Supreme Court!!! I do not know how others might feel about our courts. I believe that the Supreme Court and others are just political tools for white nationalists and other groups who wish to oppress women and people of color.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

How the Supreme Court Just Flipped the Script in VirginiaVirginia’s 66th District is arguably the precise epicenter of the nation’s political wars—and this week, the Supreme Court tilted it toward the Democrats
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

Census, redistricting top remaining Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court enters its final week of decisions with two politically charged issues unresolved, whether to rein in political line-drawing for partisan gain and allow a citizenship question on the 2020 census. So citizenship census questions is on and stopping gerrymandering is off. Got it. Seems reasonable to question how many citizens live in an area if one wants to base representation off of it. Can’t wait for the Supremes to rule 5–4 that the citizenship question on the census is OK. In addition to that being the right call, the leftist meltdown on Twitter will be…
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »