against North Carolina lawmakers, who argued the U.S. Constitution exempted state legislatures from judicial review in election cases. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said the Constitution’s Elections Clause “does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review.” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, saying the ruling unnecessarily committed the Federal Judiciary to an “uncertain path.
”The “independent state legislature” theory has been used in legal arguments to defend purportedly gerrymandered congressional districts and to oppose state court rulings on absentee ballot policies during the 2020 election. If the Supreme Court had accepted it, it could have allowed state legislatures to pass election policies with little oversight from courts.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court ruling limits challenges to unlawful convictions for innocent federal prisoners - New York Amsterdam NewsIn a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court delivered a blow to the rights of federal prisoners, particularly those who may be completely innocent.
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court news: Justice Alito targeted in a string of reports raising ethical concernsSupreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was the target of new reports raising ethical concerns about his spouse's fossil fuel lease and his close connections at a top law firm with interests in an undecided case before the court.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: fox13 - 🏆 550. / 51 Read more »