. Trump said he was picking justices who would overturn Roe, and his picks were true to form.
The majority said the case was just too complex for a quick ruling ... presenting novel issues. The fact is ... the Texas law is squarely, undeniably at odds with Roe vs. Wade. The justices hung their hats on the enforcement mechanism -- that private citizens and not the State itself was responsible for enforcing the law. But the reality is ... the ground rules for an abortion in Texas fly in the face of Roe. Nevertheless, the justices chose to punt.
Sotomayor said,"In effect, the Texas Legislature has deputized the State's citizens as bounty hunters, offering them cash prizes for civilly prosecuting their neighbors' medical procedures." This non-decision clearly sets the stage for the big showdown next term, when a Mississippi anti-abortion law squarely challenges Roe vs. Wade. It seems the Supreme Court's view of the Texas law is a precursor to squarely overturning Roe.
Good! Let the babies live!
Good
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court refuses to block restrictive Texas abortion law in 5-4 decisionWomen deserve better than what we do to them. ProChoice Time to pack the supreme court now. Put in so many judges they become irrelevant. The fact the US justice system is now a political arm makes the US no better than the likes of Iran, North Korea and Russia.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
JUST IN: Supreme Court Declines To Block Extreme Texas Abortion Law In 5-4 RulingThe ban on abortions after six weeks is the strictest in the nation. Critics have called a direct assault on Roe v. Wade. 'Critics'? Come on. It is in DIRECT contrast to Roe is the clearest way. There's no both sides-ing this.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court declines to block Texas abortion lawJustices split, 5-4, as Chief Justice John Roberts joins the court’s liberals in dissent. Tax the churches asap. Dear Liberals, We don't get homes and healthcare, you don't get abortions. Enjoy your gentrified downtowns. Oh, and wrap it twice for safety 😉 RoeVWade Scotus AbortionBan neoliberalism If Congress does not legislate, women's rights will go back half a century. We MUST codify Roe v. Wade. This Court will explicitly overrule Roe v. Wade despite the fact that it's functionally overruled by Planned Parenthood v. Casey & Gonzales v. Carhart.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court refuses to block Texas abortion law on technical groundsUnder His Eye! 2016 will haunt us in so many ways for a long, long time.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court declines to block Texas abortion banWASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Wednesday to block a Texas ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, dealing a major blow to abortion rights by leaving in place a state law that prohibits the vast majority of abortions. The decision is a major milestone in the fight over abortion, as opponents have sought for decades to roll back access to the procedure. By a 5-4 vote, the justices denied an emergency request by abortion and women's health providers for an injunction on enforcement of the ban, which took effect early on Wednesday, while litigation continues. NOTHING says BackwardACountryF like being AGAINST AWomansRightToChoose!! WontCaveDave WontCaveDave AbolishTheFilibuster ForThePeopleAct
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »