Supreme Court left-liberal justices say Trump ruling erodes ‘insurrection’ clause

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 94%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Donald Trump should remain on state primary ballots despite a moderate disagreement from Democratic-appointed justices.

should remain on state primary ballots, although a minority of the justices said the majority’s finding undercuts a provision of the Constitution meant to keep insurrectionists away from higher office.

The high court’s opinion was per curiam, meaning it had no direct author, and held that “because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of three Trump appointees who make up the six Republican-appointed justices on the bench, also wrote a concurrence that was sympathetic to the minority concurrence.

“For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home,” Barrett wrote.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Rules Trump Can Appear on State Ballots Despite Insurrection AllegationsThe Supreme Court ruled that former President Trump may not be disqualified from appearing on state ballots despite allegations of insurrection. The court said states do not have the authority to interpret the 14th Amendment to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clauseThe decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court Trump Assembled Is Going to Decide Whether Trump Is Above the LawThe Supreme Court has decided to rule on whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in the Justice Department's election interference case.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

In case over Trump's ballot eligibility, concerned voters make their own pitches to Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court's case over former President Donald Trump's ballot eligibility has attracted more than a dozen filings from voters who have felt compelled to express their views.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

The Supreme Court Weighs In On Trump Being Removed From The BallotWhen it comes to whether or not Trump should appear on presidential ballots, there are at least two questions to consider. The first is legal — does the 14th amendment apply him? The second is practical.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs Trump’s bid to stay on Colorado ballotLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »