Supreme Court Eyes The President's Power To Say 'You're Fired!'

  • 📰 NPR
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

At the Supreme Court today, the Trump administration is seeking to make it easier for the president to fire the heads of the nation's independent agencies. In the short run, the fate of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is on the line.

In 2009, Congress sought to re-establish oversight and regulation of the financial system. Among the remedies enacted was a law that consolidated the consumer protection powers of seven agencies into one — the CFPB. Placed in the offices of the Federal Reserve and funded directly by the Fed, the new agency was charged with protecting consumers and preventing a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

Once in place, the bureau moved aggressively to protect consumers from bad actors in the banking and financial services sector. A prime example: the crack-down on Wells Fargo. The bankfor creating an estimated 3.5 million fake deposit accounts and fake credit cards in the names of people who didn't authorize them, and for improperly repossessing the cars of military personnel. Also in the CFPB's sights — bill collectors, telemarketers, and others accused of misleading consumers.

Seila lost that argument in the lower courts, but now the Supreme Court will take a crack at the case. Tuesday's arguments will center on a longstanding Supreme Court decision that forms the basis for all independent federal agencies.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

We can expect more WreckItRalph crap out of thatfellaintheWH and Heritagefoundation SCOTUS as the year goes on.

America, after trump gets finished destroying it.

This is why Trump and his enablers need to go! VoteBlueToSaveAmerica

I love when one side says fuck the rules like the other side isnt going to be in power down the road and abuse the lack of rules cause one side one time didnt like how the rules were written. Fucking children

They are independent for a reason, to leave politics out of their policy decisions, but I don't expect the supreme court to understand why separation of power is important, they probably deliver what the executive wants as good lap dogs in Congress do

Trump has certainly studied how Hitler consolidated his power. I saw this stuff in the History Channel and it’s pretty much the same thing.

And the assault on our democracy continues, this is what a dictatorship in the making looks like. GOP = Russia PutinsPawns

He doing the absolute correct thing here. Anyone who has been a supervisor in the government knows that its way to difficult to fire someone. Good job Mr. President

We have to look at this beyond this President. It would be a partial return to the Spoils System of earlier US history and proved to be bad for everyone.

Jesus fuck. Barney Frank, please speak up.

Supreme Court is now trumps side kick sadly , next in oval must fix this

There can be no independent acgencies that are not responsible to the elected officials.

Reading this article sends chills down my spine. It's another BIG step towards an authoritarian/dictatorship president. It will let big business run rampant, let them write the rules...just what the oligarch-run GOP wants. We need checks and balances! I despair for my country.

Authoritarianism, one step at a time. And there's no one left to stop it.

Shortsighted Rump doesn’t realize he’s setting the trend. The next democratic president will march down the path DT creates and with ease undo all his shit.

DefundNPR

Our founders understood human nature and that with power, particularly unaccountable power, comes abuse of that power. Independent agencies wield unaccountable power. While partisan political influence is a risk, at least we have an opportunity to pick our politicians.

Egad that headline!!

All power of the executive is is vested in the President of the United States. There is no such thing as an independent agency. All agencies are subject to the directives of the president and all agency officials work for the president. Pick up a constitution sometime

Good thing the conservative majority on the Court is composed of sane, rational umpire-like judges; and not right-wing shills who have spent the last two years on their knees in front of the President.

Wrong!

Good. They should not be 'independent' of executive oversight because it breeds corruption.

HE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RETALIATE

ANYONE BUT TRUMP 2020

What a damn nightmare

Warren was dumped too

If the court gives Trump the power to fire anyone, doesn’t that make him a Dictator? The very thing he says he’s not?

Well then, that doesn’t make them very independent, does it?

The worst president of all time

If the president can't fire the heads of national agencies, then who can?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 96. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

President's power to can independent agency heads faces testA case being argued at the Supreme Court on Tuesday could threaten the structure of agencies that form an enormous swath of the federal government Our entire syatem of administrative government depends on these issues. Ugh
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

President's power to can independent agency heads faces testThe Supreme Court will hear a case Tuesday that could threaten the structure of agencies that form an enormous swath of the federal government. At issue is whether a president can fire the heads of independent agencies for any reason. ap so then we will literally have a politburo. Bad idea unless we want to be more like communist Russia Granting Trump more power is the last thing anyone needs. He's already reckless, and out of control. The Supreme Court is now officially part of the Trump cult, we’re screwed
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Abortion rights face stern new test at conservative U.S. Supreme CourtThe U.S. Supreme Court this week gets its first chance to consider new curbs on ... Come on doc- that’s brutal- There goes my lunch Sorry women but what you do with your body is Trump's call. :) Check out our page for daily infographics on the coronavirus and its global economic impact coronavirus painlesspolitics
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Democratic bid to defend ObamacareThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a politically explosive case on ... My God save Obamacare it saved my life🇺🇸 People I know are complaining they can't use it. Most doctors won't accept AffordableCare / ObamaCare ? What the hell are tax payers paying for then? This comes out our 🤬 pay checks! Democrats? Republicans? Independents? Somebody? ANYBODY? Obama ,ouh No he wasn’t good to his country trump little better,,,, to say TheJusticeDept FBI ,,,yrsattani GODBIGGESTblaaasssbye 👌🤞🏾✌🏿👆🏽🤲🏼👍🏿🤞🏾👌👌👌👌👌👌👌
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

A Supreme Court retreat from Roe vs. Wade could begin this week with Louisiana abortion caseSupreme Court to decide whether a state may force shut down of most abortion clinics. Reality: the SupremeCourt has been retreating steadily from RoevWade since Planned Parenthood v Casey in 1992. scotus abortionrights journalism Not begin but they're asking, begging really, for Dems to expand the court.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to ban on gun 'bump stocks'The Supreme Court has rejected a case brought by gun-rights advocates against President Trump's ‘bump stocks’ ban implemented after the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting 'Politics makes strange adversaries.' trump's actually pro-gun in disguise everyone sure he banned bump stocks and said he wants to seize the guns without due process but it's just 4D chess everyone he's actually really pro-gun y'all he's just gonna have to give in to everything the democrats want but you'll see 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »