Supreme Court could limit access to business data

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Freedom of Information Act cases remain a relative rarity at the Supreme Court — Monday’s arguments are the first FOIA-focused ones at the court in more than eight years.

The Trump administration has allied itself with the business groups seeking to overturn an appeals court precedent that has allowed the release of business-provided data for nearly half a century. Media outlets and transparency advocates have pushed back against the effort, warning that reining in access to such information could eliminate public scrutiny of an untold number of federal databases and other records about highly regulated, potentially dangerous industries.

In 1974, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an exemption for “confidential” business records did not apply to information that simply wasn’t public. The exemption, the judges said, could be used only in cases where the government would have trouble getting the information in the future or where release of the data would cause “substantial competitive harm.” The decision paved the way for greater public access to information about private businesses.

The Trump administration and business advocates have branded the longstanding decision as “atextual” — a description intended to be taken as a grave insult by the court’s conservative majority. “The average person is supposed to have fair notice of the statute,” Gorsuch complained, suggesting that the D.C. Circuit read words into the law that simply aren’t there.

Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

They are afraid Kavanaugh's beer consumption will be able to be extrapolated from business data.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination casesThe Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether U.S. law banning workplace ... Probably not, they invented there new names and genders after that was introduced. Probably not with this particular gaggle of social-conservative religo-zealot republican sycophants, but one can still hope. Narrator: They already made up their minds.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination casesThe Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether U.S. law banning workplace ... People like to hire others like themselves. Does that include the military? I would say a sensible Court would obviously say the law protects them, but this Court already decided that job applicants who encounter ageism have no protection.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear cases on sexual orientation, transgender status in the workplaceThe Supreme Court on Monday said it will hear cases on sexual orientation and transgender discrimination in the workplace. The Supreme Court said it's...
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Abortion rights group asks Supreme Court to strike Louisiana admitting privileges lawAbortion rights advocates ask Supreme Court to strike down controversial Louisiana law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. Love listening to dimm's whine aka HardballChris Demo woman are not happy unless they can Kill all the babies they want. Big Government Contards who tell us that the government can't do anything right have no problems shitting on women's rights.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court girds for fight over Trump census citizenship questionA sign on its front door in a heavily Hispanic neighborhood of the borough of Queens warns law enforcement officers not to enter without a warrant. Its colorful lobby is filled with butterfly-shaped placards made for protests against the hardline immigration policies of President Donald Trump, a fellow Girds...? Supreme Court encircles? Eh...
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

The Slants founder Simon Tam details Supreme Court case in new memoir“Slanted: How an Asian American Troublemaker Took on the Supreme Court,” releasing April 30, details his musical life and the journey to the high court.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court asked to void Louisiana law that could leave state with one clinicA Louisiana abortion clinic is asking the Supreme Court to strike down regulations that could leave the state with just one clinic. You know, now I really am questioning which is more badass, ovaries or a snake? Curious, so now that you restrict woman from having abortions, is the state prepare to help take care of the babies once they are born? Cause it seems to me y'all are more pro-birth and less pro-life. Hahahah...God luck with that. Not while Boofin Brett is on the case(of beer).
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

India's Supreme Court chief justice denies sexually harassing assistantThe chief justice of India's Supreme Court, Ranjan Gogoi, on Saturday denie... *
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Adnan Syed update: 'Serial' murder defendant to petition Supreme CourtSyed, whose appeal was rejected by Maryland's highest court, now plans to seek relief from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Afghan supreme court extends Ghani's term until delayed electionsThe decision resolves the question of what would happen after President Ashraf Ghani's term expires on May 22. The presidential elections were initially slated for April 20 but were delayed until July 20, then pushed back again until September 28.
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »

Accuracy at core of Supreme Court case over census questionThe accuracy of the once-a-decade population count is at the heart of the Supreme Court case over the Trump administration's effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. …Democrats want to water down your state’s representatives and voice by allowing multitudes of illegals to be counted in the census without noting if they are citizens. This is the most brain dead move by Democrats. A census is a waste. Voter registration should be the basis for the census. If you don't vote, you don't get counted. The census determines State funding, State representation, electoral college votes. Yes, it's important to know how many non-citizens are living within each State.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »