Supreme Court appears split on whether Congress and prosecutors can see Trump's tax returns

The United States Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in two cases that could help decide the limits of presidential accountability and whether President Trump can continue to defy lawmakers and local prosecutors seeking to glimpse his tax and business records.

The first case heard by the Court concerned subpoenas for financial records that committees of the House of Representatives had issued to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP, and to one of his major bankers, Deutsche Bank. The second case covered a similar subpoena issued to Mazars by a grand jury empaneled for the office of Manhattan District Attorney C Vance Jr.

In both cases, Trump’s attorneys argued the president’s unique role makes him vulnerable to partisan attacks. “No county district attorney in our nation’s history has issue criminal process against a sitting president and for good reason, the Constitution doesn’t allow it,” Sekulow said in his opening remarks.

Sekulow’s opening statement touched on the second major element of Trump’s attorneys defense in both cases — the idea that undue investigations could distract the president from more important work. Sekulow made this case with a hypothetical: “The supposed floodgates have been open for generations,” Dunne replied to that argument, “and there’s never been a flood.”

Unique among his predecessors, Trump came to the White House after a lifetime spent in the private sector. Other presidents placed all their investments into an independently administered blind trust; Trump chose to maintain close ties to his business empire and its attendant potential conflicts of interest through a revocable trust administered by his sons. Unlike other presidents, Trump chose to keep his tax returns and the details of his financial affairs secret.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

Won't have to worry about the supreme Court, New York General Attorney is waiting at the White House front door, come January.

Personal tax returns are just that personal. No state has the right to force the President to show taxes unless he chooses.

Yet another virus is haunting poor President

Split on the LAW?! More like split on who is in his pockets

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court hears arguments over whether Trump can keep tax records shielded from CongressAttorneys for President Donald Trump faced questions from the justices of the Supreme Court on Tuesday over whether allowing Trump to keep his tax records shielded from House Democrats would unconstitutionally limit the power of Congress to conduct investigations. Tough questions but still guessing Trump's Supreme Court will give him a pass. Putting on a good show, though. Nope. Anyone who runs, or serves, in public office should have to open their books to the PUBLIC! They work for us, they are paid by us, and they are elected by us! releasetrumptaxes And Sekelow is making it hard for anyone to think that there’s nothing incriminating in them.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court appears headed for a split decision on Trump taxes, financial recordsThe cases involve efforts by House Democrats and a N.Y. prosecutor to obtain the president&39;s documents. THAT'S IT! I have said for a while now, the only reason Trump wants re-election in Nov to to keep his butt out of legal trouble. He knows that if he loses, his trash won't be out of the WH five minutes before an indictment is unsealed! That means a 5-4 victory for Trump. If it was 5-4 the other way, it would be reported as 'Supreme Court hands Trump a stunning defeat.' They should uphold the law one day they may be dealing with a Democrat and not be able to see anything of theirs or even make them testify. But then Democrats are honest.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court skeptical of House's demand for Trump financial recordsBoth liberal and conservatice justices raised concerns today that lawmakers’ efforts to subpoena Trump’s tax returns could set a harmful precedent He's the first president to refuse to disclose his taxes 'temporarily,' using the untrue excuse of an 'audit.' He has incessantly lied to our faces for 3.5 years, and presided over an admin helped to power by Putin and rocked by scandal. Talk about your harmful precedents. Jay Sekulow: president is NOT above the law. Scotus SCOTUSblog USSupremeCourt JusticeRoberts JusticeKavanagh JD_Sotomayor JusticeBreyer Justice_Kagan His finances must pass the smell test. He’s being paid by the taxpayers and needs to act on our behalf, not his own. The demand is valid.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court wary of presidential 'harassment' in Trump finances fightIn a major showdown over presidential powers, U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared divided over President Donald Trump's bid to prevent congressional Democrats from obtaining his financial records but seemed more open toward a New York prosecutor's attempt to secure similar records. We’ll see... Banana republic I'm not getting my hopes up.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court hears arguments in Trump taxes cases.PeteWilliamsNBC discusses the latest from the Supreme Court cases on President Trump's tax returns and personal financial records. PeteWilliamsNBC For the love of God PeteWilliamsNBC 👮‍♀️ PeteWilliamsNBC Most Americans want to know more about the failed COUP attempt on a duly elected president and the potential involvement of Obama that has just came out!!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

In Cases On Trump Financial Records, Supreme Court Weighs Balance Of PowerThe Supreme Court heard arguments today in cases involving subpoenas for President Trump's financial records — decisions that could end up having profound consequences for executive power in the U.S. This is what I heard from the Supreme Court this morning; 'Some future president might be burdened in some way if we allow Trump's dishonesty and criminal activity to be exposed...' The fix is in. Profound consequences including dismantling democracy in favor of authoritarianism. Trump will never leave. There will not be an election on Nov. 3. ginsburg made material apparently false statement
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »