Richard Komer of the Institute for Justice, representing the mothers, told the court Wednesday that the question"is whether the U.S. Constitution allows the wholesale exclusion of religious schools from a state scholarship program. It does not."
"What if the state said you can use scholarship funds for private schools, but not for Jewish or Protestant schools? Wouldn't that be discrimination?" he asked. Komer said another decision by the Supreme Court three years ago is heavily in the mothers' favor. In that ruling, the court said that Missouri was wrong to exclude a Lutheran church from a state program intended to help nonprofits cover their gravel playgrounds with a safer rubber surface.
Espinoza, one of the mothers in the Montana case, said she believes so strongly in the Christian school her daughters attend that she works two jobs to afford the private school tuition.
PeteWilliamsNBC Thanks for nothing.
MUDDLAW PeteWilliamsNBC Such a ruling could affect laws or constitutional provisions in 37 states that currently bar public funding for schools and churches. (Territories included).
PeteWilliamsNBC So that means all religions correct. Paganism, Muslim, Shinto, ...
PeteWilliamsNBC Tax religious institutions.
PeteWilliamsNBC These poor religious schools, persecuted and mistreated day and night.
PeteWilliamsNBC will that include Madrassa's and Schul's as well? If not it clearly violates the establishment clause.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court takes up church-state separation in Christian schools caseMontana told the Supreme Court that 'barring aid to religious institutions promotes religious freedom by preventing the government from using its leverage to dictate religious policy.' the biggest problem is this is something short lived both millienials and gen z are 50% each more spiritual then religious or religious nones by 2050 only 12% of americans will be practicing any christian religion Here we go...Republican’ts sold their followers on theory that Dems were going to allow Sharia law to take over our democracy while they were actually plotting to create a Christian theocracy in the US. Religion is the root of all evil. Separation of Church and State.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court battle over school choice may boost religious freedomKendra Espinoza gets her latest day in court Wednesday as she fights the decision to discontinue a program that helped fund tuition scholarships. Religious schools are basically private schools and they should fund themselves. No state or government funds should go to these schools is it sensible &/or a sign of intelligence ... ... to preach any 1 of ~4000 competing religions - that nobody can prove & against all the evidence. Are we surprised if we *think* we have mentalhealth challenges?
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Religion and school choice on the line in 'crucial' Supreme Court caseThe case is a major test for the balance between dueling constitutional principles: protection for religious freedom and a prohibition against government support of religion. The radical right wing religious terrorists will do whatever they can to eradicate the separation of church and state. This is their way of getting their“foot in the door to begin chipping away at our constitution. If they get one case in front of the SC the floodgates will open! You call yourselves a news organization. Calling a pro gun rally a white supremacist rally. I found the white supremacist, the governor of Virginia Ralf (blackface baby killing) Northam!!!! The case is a major test for the balance between dueling constitutional principles: protection for religious freedom and a prohibition against justice league support of religion.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Appeals on Affordable Care ActThe Supreme Court’s action means it won’t consider the Obamacare case this term, while lower court rulings have placed the health law in limbo. Trump and GOP should do universal healthcare so Dems can't. It would be epic. Another win for Trump, but the GOP better get their health care shit together. Helping Trump.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court won't hear Obamacare case before electionThe decision deals a blow to Democrats’ hopes to elevate the issue in 2020, but it will come as a relief to Trump and Republicans, who’ve been wary of the lawsuit’s potential to scramble their election hopes. The Supreme Court rejected Democrats' request to expedite review of a lawsuit threatening Obamacare MikeLastort Lazy Supremes... Sitting on their perch... Collecting pay.. Doing nothing... Why do we need these people again? Couldn't they just be replaced with housecats and sloths?
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »