their authors from using the advanced chatbot, ChatGPT. Because the bot uses information from the internet to produce highly readable answers to questions, the publishers are worried that inaccurate or plagiarised work could enter the pages of academic literature.Several researchers have already listed the chatbot as a co-author in academic studies, and some publishers have moved to ban this practice.
Our thinking was: if it’s easy to get good outcomes from ChatGPT by simply using it, maybe there’s something extra we can do to turn these good results into great ones. We then asked that the program take these into account when creating the four research stages. Finally, for version three, we added “domain expertise” — input from academic researchers. We read the answers produced by the computer program and made suggestions for improvements. In doing so, we integrated our expertise with that of ChatGPT.We then requested a panel of 32 reviewers, each review one version of how ChatGPT can be used to generate an academic study.
A mostly useless electronic assistant, somewhat useful in niche cases where a little bit of inspiration is useful and so on. It's a common misconception anyway that common AI is about 'replacing' humans rather than being a tool used by humans in integrated workflows.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
ChatGPT may be fastest growing app in history, UBS report saysChatGPT may be the fastest-growing consumer app in internet history, reaching 100 million users in just over 2 months, UBS report says The future is AI and web3 Neat now go talk to a human
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »
Source: Gothamist - 🏆 456. / 53 Read more »
Source: BGR - 🏆 234. / 63 Read more »
Source: DigitalTrends - 🏆 95. / 65 Read more »