The film, the opening installment in George Lucas’ Prequel Trilogy, was the first Star Wars movie in 16 years when it was released. Shortly after it hit theaters in May 1999, though, it became the target of a lot of vitriol and criticism. Star Wars fans went into it expecting a prequel that felt of a piece with the franchise’s Original Trilogy.
Related The good, the bad, and the ugly To be totally clear: The writing and acting in Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace is really bad. Lucas, for all of his many strengths, has never had a great ear for dialogue , and that’s on full display in The Phantom Menace. His inability to truly communicate with actors results in distractingly stiff turns from Natalie Portman, Jake Lloyd, Samuel L. Jackson, and plenty of others, too.
The movie’s visuals are massively underrated The Phantom Menace has often been criticized for its bright, polished aesthetic, which immediately separates it from the gloriously dingy look of the Original Trilogy. But, despite what those criticisms might suggest, The Phantom Menace is frequently astonishing to look at. David Tattersall’s cinematography remains appallingly underrated.
Movies & TV Star Wars Star Wars Movies Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace The Phantom Menace
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: SPACEdotcom - 🏆 92. / 67 Read more »
Source: ComicBook - 🏆 65. / 68 Read more »
Source: ComicBook - 🏆 65. / 68 Read more »
Source: ComicBook - 🏆 65. / 68 Read more »