, a microbiologist who works as an independent science-integrity consultant, said there were “serious problems” in some studies that list Tessier-Lavigne as a co-author.announced last week that it is reviewing a 2008 paper about axon receptors in which Tessier-Lavigne is listed as the ninth of 11 authors. On PubPeer, Bik raised concerns that some of the images included in the paper might have been digitally altered.
“I don’t think the university should handle the investigation,” Bik said. “I don’t think they could possibly investigate him in an objective way.” “The question that hopefully the Stanford investigation will answer honestly is, ‘Are these intentional manipulations?’” said Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, a blog that reports on scientific misconduct. “Science is based on showing your work and being honest about what you found.”
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SFGate - 🏆 534. / 51 Read more »
Source: svbizjournal - 🏆 334. / 59 Read more »
Source: svbizjournal - 🏆 334. / 59 Read more »
Stanford Football: Stanford Football Head Coaching Hot Board: Nov. 30thslamdunk406 If you can't even spell the man's name correctly then you REALLY shouldn't be tweeting anything about him. You are just embarrassing yourselves.
Source: Rivals - 🏆 536. / 51 Read more »
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »
Source: futurism - 🏆 85. / 68 Read more »