Social Media’s Liability Shield Is Under Assault

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The law that enabled the rise of social media and other internet businesses is facing threats unlike anything in its 24-year history, with potentially significant consequences for websites that host user content

WASHINGTON—.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was instrumental to the success of Silicon Valley tech giants such as Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google and YouTube by giving them broad immunity for the content they publish from users on their sites.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

If they want to behave like publishers, then they should be subject to the rules of publishers. If they don't want to be publishers, then they must stop restricting content.

Simple solution.. don’t censor.

time for RE_ELECTION -😡😡 some people are making EVIL - PLOT against Americans ...... - Only TRUMP can save america.. see the situation in europeee (france / sweden ) ..... - only trump can save

After 2016 election didn't they get guidance, mandate, crap to ferret out the false, misleading and outright lies? That's what twitter, facebook did. Now people are still complaining. It's not free speech when lies, twisted acts are spread. You wouldn't accept that w marketing?

Wow social media’s been around for a whopping 24 years - I’m sure they know exactly how to control the enormous power that they’ve been gifted...hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha

If they acted like a platform and not some weird social engineering, anti-free speech, cold-war era blacklisting, authoritarian controlers. Then these sites wouldn't be dealing with this now.

Take steps to put things in perspective, that's a major function of industrial leadership.

The Act must be wiped out and start over ..it has made billionaires in control of content and their deception to Report based on what they want reported..

translation: Our chinese masters are saying that this law its important to control. Pls don't mess with it.

When AM broadcast radio first became available 100 years ago, the government politicians expressed concern because the content was unregulated, so they trotted out regulations like the fairness doctrine as a result.

thanks for this news

Whoohoo ‼️🇺🇸

Nuke it. They were given ample opportunity to self-correct and they went the opposite way. RepealSection230

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Senators propose limiting liability shield for social media platformsThree Democratic U.S. senators introduced a bill that would limit Section 230, a law that shields online companies from liability over content posted by users, and make the companies more accountable when posts result in harm. ridiculous. OF COURSE TheDemocrats leaders would do this! Twitter works for THEM! 😯🙄 Good, we need to hold the Fake News people like Trump and Marjorie Q Green accountable for their lies.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. senators propose limiting liability shield for social media platformsThree Democratic U.S. senators introduced a bill that would limit Section 230, a law that shields online companies from liability over content posted by users, and make the companies more accountable when posts result in harm. Called the SAFE TECH Act, the legislation would mark the latest effort to make U.S. social media companies like Alphabet Inc's Google, Twitter Inc and Facebook Inc more accountable for 'enabling cyber-stalking, targeted harassment, and discrimination on their platforms,' Senators Mark Warner, Mazie Hirono and Amy Klobuchar said in a statement. Several Republican lawmakers have also been separately pushing to scrap the law entirely over decisions by tech platforms to moderate content.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Trump Claims He’ll Veto Defense Spending Bill Unless Congress Repeals Legal Shield for Social Media CompaniesPresident Trump, upset that Twitter and Facebook have been fact-checking his conspiracy theories alleging widespread fraud in the 2020 election, is attempting to strong-arm Congress into rolling ba…
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »

Facebook, Twitter, Google CEOs split over social media shield lawWho’s legally responsible for policing social media posts? The heads of Google, Facebook and Twitter have taken different positions on that question. More good news please((( Whatever twitter decides is the right thing. Google had privacy issues especially with Chrome where everyone's data was picked and probably sold. Facebook is the mother of bad manners when it comes to privacy. Twitter I say Aye.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

How to Have a Great Social Life Even with Social AnxietyHow people with social anxiety can create connection and enjoy the company of others, explains WendyPatrickPhD WendyPatrickPhD Evoshrink: Do Your Evolution! Embracing the anxiety erases the anxiety (in time). Learning how is most important.
Source: PsychToday - 🏆 714. / 51 Read more »