–
“The principle does not change because the curated compilation has gone from the physical to the virtual world. In the latter, as in the former, government efforts to alter an edited compilation of third-party expression are subject to judicial review for compliance with the First Amendment,” Kagan wrote in an opinion joined fully by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett and partly by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The tech groups praised Monday’s decision as a victory. The Supreme Court “agreed with all our First Amendment arguments,” NetChoice Litigation Center director Chris Marchese said in a statement. “Free speech is a cornerstone of our republic.
As examples of the disputed issues in the Florida case, part of the law would prevent platforms from banning political candidates from their sites and require companies to publish — and apply consistently — standards about issues such as banning users or blocking their content. The law seeks to regulate social media platforms that have annual gross revenue of over $100 million or more than 100 million monthly active users.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
Florida Texas Lawmakers U.S. Supreme Court
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Source: DenverChannel - 🏆 239. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »