WASHLITE argued in its initial filing that Fox News was subject to established protections for consumers against false information and put forth the notion that deceptive or unfair acts may be enjoined under statutes in Washington state.In an eight-page document, however, Superior Court Judge Brian McDonald said WASHLITE had failed to establish a case, noting that its “assertions do not hold up to scrutiny.
Fox News expressed satisfaction at the outcome. “Using a false portrayal of Fox News Channel’s commentary, WASHLITE attempted to silence a national news organization to settle a partisan grievance,” Fox News said in a statement. “This was not only wrong, but contemptuous of the foundation of free speech and we are both pleased the court dismissed this frivolous case and grateful to the First Amendment community that rallied to our side.
Catherine Clark, an attorney representing WASHLITE, said that “an appeal will be filed within the designated appeal period,” but declined to elaborate.who came to the network’s defense in an amicus brief. The Internet and Television Association, a trade organization that represents CNN parent WarnerMedia and MSNBC overseer NBCUniversal, the suit “asserted that news providers do not enjoy First Amendment protection when they distribute their programming over a cable television system.
TheTweetOfGod Donald Trump killed his personal assistant, Carolyn Gombell, in October 2000. He strangled her because he'd gotten her pregnant and was threatening to tell the press. Then he bribed NYPD Police Chief Bernie Kierik to cover it up. JusticeForCarolyn
Omg i cry
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »