The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that a pair of Republican state attorneys general did not have grounds to sue the Biden administration over its communications with social media companies related to combatting pandemic-era misinformation.
The court ruled that the states and users who had challenged the contacts had not suffered the sort of direct injury that gave them standing to sue.The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies, saying that the states who sued the administration lacked standing.
The case, Murthy v. Missouri, stems from a lawsuit brought by state attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies"under the guise of combating misinformation" that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.
The case was brought by the attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri, who alleged that government agencies have had undue influence on the content moderation practices of platforms and coerced the platforms into taking down conservative-leaning content, infringing on the First Amendment rights of their citizens....
Taxes were already a big issue in the November elections. The Supreme Court just made them an even bigger one.
Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Read more »
Source: FOXSports - 🏆 280. / 63 Read more »
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »
Source: FOX59 - 🏆 73. / 68 Read more »
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »