Wednesday he had not done so maliciously or realized it would be taken to suggest she had incited the shooting, saying he has “regretted [his wording choice] pretty much every day since.”made false statements about her with “actual malice,” meaning there’s “clear and convincing” evidence the newspaper knew they were false or “or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”’ part, but it did not rise to the “very high standard” of actual malice.
“It’s an incredibly important case, because it is about freedom of the press, and about the First Amendment,”attorney David Axelrod said in his closing statement Friday, adding it was also about “an honest mistake” and Bennet had also offered a public apology to Palin after the piece was corrected. “Why would somebody write, ‘We screwed up,’ if we intended to harm somebody?”published the claim knowing it was false and that the op-ed had hurt Palin personally and professionally.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
AlisonD64 Lol
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Sarah Palin Loses Defamation Case Against New York Times As Judge Says He’ll Dismiss ItThe jury is still deliberating in the case, but the judge's opinion is what will carry legal weight. Sarah Failin
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Judge to dismiss Sarah Palin defamation case against The New York TimesU.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan said he will order the dismissal of Palin’s lawsuit after the jury finishes deliberating. Now she can go back home to Alaska and sit on her back porch and look at Russia.🤣 She should be used to losing. It’s not her first time. I do like those sunglasses, though.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Jury resumes deliberations in Sarah Palin case against New York TimesA U.S. jury on Monday resumed deliberations in a defamation lawsuit against the New York Times by Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican U.S. vice presidential candidate, in a case seen as a test of longstanding protections for American media.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Sarah Palin’s Anti-New York Times Crusade Crashes and Burns“My job is to apply the law,” U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff said, noting that he anticipates an appeal in the case. “The law sets a very high standard for actual malice and in this case the Court finds that standard has not been met.” Any 1L who completed Torts II could have foreseen this result. The case was, is and will always be a loser. Actual malice as a standard. How you going to prove that without actual admissions from the defendants? Impossible standard without defendant admitting actual malice at the time they printed. Next time try a slip and fall case. 🤣
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Judge to dismiss Palin libel lawsuit against NY TimesU.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff says he’ll let jury deliberations continue in case his decision winds up being reversed on appeal.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Judge dismisses Palin libel lawsuit against NY TimesNEW YORK (AP) — A judge said Monday he’ll dismiss a libel lawsuit that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin filed against The New York Times, claiming the newspaper damaged her reputation with an editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting. *sad trombone* No shit. Sarah palin just wasted the court’s time, she knew she wouldn’t win. Yea well this year all you media are fixing to get ripped! This is nothing.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »