FILE - This image provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Thursday, Aug. 15, 2019, shows proposed cigarette warning labels. A federal rule requiring that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking, including pictures of smoke-damaged lungs and feet blackened by diminished blood flow, does not violate the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, March 21, 2024.
The ruling overturns a lower court order from a federal district court in Texas, where a judge found the requirements violate the First Amendment. While reversing the lower court's First Amendment finding, the panel noted that the judge had not ruled on the APA-based challenge. It sent the case back to the district court to consider that issue.
Nearly 120 countries around the world have adopted larger, graphic warning labels. Studies from those countries suggest the image-based labels are more effective than text warnings at publicizing smoking risks and encouraging smokers to quit.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court saysA federal appeals court says a requirement that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking does not violate the First Amendment.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear First Amendment challenge to New York's financial 'blacklisting' of NRAThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear arguments in a key First Amendment case brought by the NRA to challenge a government official’s action they say violates the First Amendment.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs NRA First Amendment dispute against New York regulatorThe Supreme Court weighed if a New York official can be sued for violating free speech rights by urging banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the NRA.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court Justice Expresses Concerns About First Amendment and Social Media CensorshipU.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises concerns about the First Amendment limiting the government's ability to regulate speech on social media platforms. She discusses the possibility of encouraging or requiring censorship for public safety.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »
Former Ohio House Speaker Appeals Conviction, Claims Bribe was Protected by First AmendmentFormer Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder appeals his guilty conviction and 20-year sentence, arguing that the bribe he accepted was protected by his First Amendment rights. He remains in federal prison for his role in the state's largest bribery scheme.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
New York lawyer fights 'First Amendment retaliation' for cursing out police officer in free speech sagaAttorney Tony Rupp and the Buffalo PD have been enmeshed in civil litigation since 2016, when Rupp was ticketed after calling out, 'Turn your lights on, a------!' to an officer.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »