notes: “Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading.”
But the 98-page draft is unequivocally clear that the Supreme Court should not have made the broad ruling protecting abortion rights. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes. “Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.
Republican lawmakers across the country have passed — or are preparing to pass — laws that criminalize, invalidate, or radically limit a woman’s right to choose whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term. Those laws for decades have been struck down in the federal judiciary, but with Roe gone, abortion rights and access for millions of women in the United States would quickly be sharply curtailed, if not eliminated altogether.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
Fucking ugly country right now
I thought the slippery slope was a fallacy?
WOOKIE318 it goes to the states now , if u want to kill your fetus , move to a state that will let u do it up to 9 months
Fuck the Supreme Court. They have no legitimacy anymore. Not as a legal entity. Not as a Constitutional entity. When I was a kid, I thought that Justices were the most brilliant and qualified Constitutional experts making good faith decisions based on precedent and...
Discipline and responsibility has escaped “liberals”.
Amazingly many men who prefer to help pay for abortions rather than 18 years of child support are silent..they should speak up rather than let women take all the heat.
They call it Pro Choice not Pro Abortion for a reason. No government or stranger has the right to dictate to a woman what type of medical procedure she should have. Its a privacy issue. Women have the right to body autonomy & have the mental capacity to make their own decisions
So, if Alito's argument is correct that 'abortion isn't in the Constitution,' does that mean the SCOTUS will decide this by a 5 & 3/5s to 3 vote? Asking for ClarenceThomas.
For all who “Just don’t like” HRC this is all on you! Making your statement will affect this country for decades. Hope your purest attitude is happy now 🤬 LGBTQ is now being threatened as well. Better vote blue all the way down the ticket! VoteBlueIn2022
Roe isn’t gone, doofus. That was the FIRST vote. The first one. Meaning there will be more and things change.
I was given up for adoption at birth before RoeVWade. I was adopted into a RightWing fundamentalist RomanCatholic family. SCOTUS has ruled. It's time for the Congress & Senate to settle the laws defining life & liberty & amend the Constitution!
The correct term is 'birthing persons' not 'women' when referring to those that can get abortions. With my office's help we can get your team back on track!
There will be a massive pink wave coming in November♀️ WomensRights
We’re getting the short end of the wire hanger again
I just do not understand why people want to control women’s bodies…Christian arguments in a country of open religion and separation of church and state…SMH😡
US legal system is crumbling in real time... We don't even need law schools anymore with this kind of hokey shit from the top court
Re: Roe v. Wade With Roe in Serious Jeopardy..This Will Be The..
Griswold also. Condoms will be illegal.
Can men now not get pregnant after all? It’s hard to keep track. 🫃🏻
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »
Source: dothaneagle - 🏆 337. / 59 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »