The term, which originated in the early 2010s, denotes that findings in behavioral science often cannot be replicated: Researchers do not obtain results comparable to the original, peer-reviewed study when repeating that study using similar procedures. For this reason, many scientists question the accuracy of published findings and now call for increased scrutiny of research practices in psychology.
Journals are incentivized to publish interesting and surprising findings. This leads to publication bias, the tendency to publish positive findings rather than studies that find no effect. Researchers are incentivized to publish as often as possible to advance their careers. Therefore, they may exercise flexibility in theirA landmark paper in 2015 revealed that of 97 attempts to replicate previous research findings, fewer than 40 percent were deemed successful.
Publications in peer-reviewed, refereed scholarly journals are the currency of academia. Yet, the process is opaque. Tips from an experienced journal editor are presented. Thoughts on Francesca Gino’s fall from grace, whether it relates to gender, and the failures of the academic publishing process to prevent research misconduct.Behavioral Science in the 21st Century: 5 ChallengesThere are lots of good reasons for having a pet in your life, but reducing your medical bills is not one of them.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: PsychToday - 🏆 714. / 51 Read more »
Source: hackernoon - 🏆 532. / 51 Read more »
Source: hackernoon - 🏆 532. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: ComicBook - 🏆 65. / 68 Read more »
Source: autocar - 🏆 93. / 67 Read more »