– a mathematical concept that means very small changes in the initial arrangement have a big impact later on.
Usually, the number of particles a quantum computer can simulate depends on the number of qubits it can use. Here, the researchers used just three to 11 qubits. Chertkov says that the Quantinuum quantum computer could do this because the algorithm directed it to keep “recycling” qubits during the calculation. When the computer needed more qubits, it would choose one it had already used, reset it and then reuse it, all without disturbing other qubits involved in the ongoing calculation.
The researchers already knew how a line of particles should behave over time from previous calculations and that is what they saw in their simulation, suggesting that it works.at the Flatiron Institute in New York says that the next test for the new algorithm would be to simulate a system that conventional computers can’t handle, such as particles in 2D materials rather than just in a line.
at Rice University in Texas says that the chaotic element makes the simulation more relevant to the real world. If you just picked a system inspired by nature at random, it would probably be chaotic, he says.
Adding particles with gravity and heat involved or just adding?
I could see it mitigating risk based on probability, but not sure how it can develop new materials I've been hearing about.
Is this the one in Sweden
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ordinary computers can beat Google’s quantum computer after allIn 2019, Google's quantum computer Sycamore performed in 200 seconds an abstruse calculation they said would tie up a supercomputer for 10,000 years. Now, scientists in China have done the computation in a few hours with ordinary processors. 200 seconds few hours 🤔 How many hours and how chipsets, cores etc were used break that record? The battle's on
Source: NewsfromScience - 🏆 515. / 51 Read more »
Source: TheAVClub - 🏆 340. / 59 Read more »
Source: TheAVClub - 🏆 340. / 59 Read more »
Source: physorg_com - 🏆 388. / 55 Read more »
Source: SciTechDaily1 - 🏆 84. / 68 Read more »
Source: IntEngineering - 🏆 287. / 63 Read more »