Perspective | How the Supreme Court fractured the nation — and how it threatens to do so again

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 72%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Perspective: How the Supreme Court fractured the nation — and how it threatens to do so again

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Sad days to come when news outlets attempt to fracture nation with biased reporting.

The problem with the analogy is that you compare anti-abortion folks to abolitionists, when they’re the ones trying to claim ownership over someone else’s body.

I think the oft repeated talk of of a Red/Blue divide is an indication of laziness and at best misleading an at worst divisive. Example a Republican won the Florida governorship by 10,000 votes yet Florida is counted as a Red state.

What a load of codswallop. Some right wing blog might consider the essay to be intellectual or compelling, but it's really nonsense. The basic premise is, 'Don't counter abortion restrictions, lest you drive those who support women into doing something rash, oh my!'

If you stop baby killing, there could be a civil war? That’s really the argument?

Here’s how: progressives made it more powerful than the other branches of government during the twentieth century and now when that power is lawfully transferred to a conservative majority via a presidential election, they whine and scream about the Court fracturing the nation.

it's been fractured since Roe v Wade

Perspective = Whining?

Poor media . . . . the BOOM is near!!!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court to decide if Fosamax users can sue Merck over bone fracturesThe Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case brought by more than 500 Fosamax users from 45 states trying to sue drug-maker Merck over spontaneous fractures. Bone fracture What is Forsemax?
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Perspective | The Supreme Court confirmation process is actually less political than it once wasOur fights over nominees might be bitter, but they’re still less contentious than the 19th century.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Perspective | How activists resisted — and ultimately overturned — an unjust Supreme Court decisionPerspective: How activists resisted — and ultimately overturned — an unjust Supreme Court decision Please give me an example of race bait verdicts i cant read the articles they want me to donate a dollar Back the Americans had big nuts and defended our country, lived our country. Today the liberals can’t even tell if they’re male or female, and thecliberal media helps keep them so mixed up into being so soft. Maybe we do need a war to toughen up this country again. Exactly
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Perspective | A century of rulings: How the Supreme Court has remade free speechSince 1919, the Court has been reinterpreting, and limiting, the First Amendment. We are living in the biblical times of the judges....everyone doing what is right in their own eyes Hey WashingtonPost do you have Free Speech in Qatar 🤔🤔 For ones, it is no longer a Free Speech, but a paid Corporate Speech. SCOTUS decision in Citizens United radically changed definition of Free Speech.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Again to Consider Partisan GerrymanderingThe Supreme Court will try again to tackle political gerrymandering, announcing that it will hear cases from North Carolina and Maryland to decide whether there are constitutional limits to how far lawmakers can go in drawing electoral districts to maximize their partisan advantage. They need to focus on racial gerrymandering. They can finally vote, and breathe a sigh of relief, now that the HONORABLE kAVANAUGH is in the room. Wise sidestep in an election year
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court will consider gerrymandering againSkewed maps in Maryland and North Carolina are on the docket for March Let’s hope they ALL have their “thinking caps” on this time! FairVotingMatters Gerrymandering are the Democrats. Instead of uniting around a President to fight the good fight, they prefer to keep things as they are... the corruption that have hidden 9/11. They gerrymander by keeping us all divided. The ratio of the geographic area of a political district to the square of its total perimeter (or else that of its circumscribed circle) should meet a certain minimum requirement of substantiality to avoid being considered a gerrymander.
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »

Finally, the Supreme Court is taking up gun rights again'Far too often for too long, the 2nd Amendment has been a second-class right, banished to the back of the constitutional bus.' (via latimesopinion) opinion socialist opinion The second amendment was written in the days of muzzle-loaders! The constitution is flawed as it is not relevant to the 21st century opinion What the actual fu(k with this quote? If anything, the 2nd has been given too much priority over other rights...
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court again takes no action on DACA, leaving policy in effect for nowThe Supreme Court on Tuesday once again did not act on the Trump administration's effort to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, leaving protections for nearly 700,000 undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children in place for at least the next several months. As a bully realDonaldTrump has no idea how to negotiate And STILL no apology for the horrible effects your intentionally false coverage - including your employees CALLING FOR VIOLENCE - has had on the children you falsely attacked. FakeNewsCNN refuses to address their victims! How can scotus not take away the rights from DACA kids, but take the rights away from transgender kids in the same morning?
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Perspective | The courts will likely let Trump declare an ‘emergency,’ even if it’s made upPerspective: There is no real emergency at the border. But Trump might still get his wall. At least he cares about this country unlike SpeakerPelosi. “I have a hammer” It all comes down to whether John Roberts has any spine at all No
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

It's been a good week for poultry at the Supreme CourtSupreme Court, rightly, rebuffed Missouri state attorney general's suit against the California egg law requiring all eggs sold in the state come from hens not cruelly confined. opinion And here I thought Chucky was showing off his new plumage. opinion but no time for complacency 😂 opinion Hopefully darth bader ginsberg will kick the bucket soon.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »