Pelosi mulls adding more anti-Trump Republicans to Jan. 6 investigation

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering adding another anti-Trump House Republican to the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, with Rep. Adam Kinzinger as the leading contender

Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering adding another anti-Trump House Republican to the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, with Rep. Adam Kinzinger as a leading contender.

not even bipartisan; it’s nonpartisan. It’s about seeking the truth and that’s what we owe the American people.” "Denver is somebody who's got years of experience, especially in all the areas connected to cyber issues," she said. "And I think [he] just would be a tremendous addition to the work of the committee in terms of understanding, recognizing the extent to which social media platforms were used, the communications that went on in the lead up to the 6th."

"I'm open to anyone of any political viewpoint who does not want to obstruct the work of the committee," Rep. Jamie Raskin said. "I’m sure Kinzinger would not want to obstruct the work of the committee.” The effort to potentially beef up Republican representation on the select panel comes after House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy pulled all five of his choices on Wednesday following Pelosi's veto of the two most controversial names on his list, Reps. Jim Banks and Jim Jordan .

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

rachaelmbade It’s not “anti-Trump”. It’s pro-democratic process

rachaelmbade *Anti-insurrection Republican *Anti-vote to overturn the election Republican *Anti anti-democracy Republican Sheesh.

She already pissed in her cheerios. The illusion of fair and balanced research is gone forever.

Yes, if Kinzinger is willing, yes. The committee needs him and others like him for diversity/legitimacy. Pelosi should appoint him to the committee

rachaelmbade Wow with the framing

So...this isn't really an honest committee investigation of what occurred but is an attempt to complete the destruction of Trump. I understand going after Trump but never will understand the total hatred surpassing what should be an honest inquiry.

SpeakerPelosi should have appointed RepKinzinger when she appointed RepLizCheney!! Speaker Pelosi rectify the oversight -- TODAY!! Since GOPLeader will undoubtably be called to testify, ethically he should recuse himself from appointing any Committee members at all!!

Trying to figure out who is Politico? Seems to not be very newsy; more agenda driven. Also their cookie approach is annoying.

'anti-trump' how about labeling them 'sane, pro democracy' republicans.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Pelosi rejects Republican Jim Jordan for Jan. 6 committee, McCarthy threatens to pull all his nomineesNEW: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy threatens to pull all his Republican nominees from the committee unless all his selections are seated. Thank you Madam Speaker for not allowing the select committee to be turned into a 3 ring circus. The GQP had the option in the Senate to form a bipartisan committee but their response was “nothing to see here, let’s move on.” Benghazi? 09/11? Oh but never mind an insurrection. 😤 Nope
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Jan. 6 commission collapses after Nancy Pelosi vetoes GOP selections Jim Jordan, Jim Banks'I agree with what the speaker has done.' Rep. Cheney addresses media after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejects Reps. Jim Banks and Jim Jordan for the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol. LynnFors I still disagree with about 90% of what Liz Cheney believes in. But that 10% where she remembers country over party is magnificent. 😂 It's like picking your own mother as a judge and jury. Pelosi is involved which makes the whole thing a shitshow. Is it a secret what outcome Pelosi wants?😂 It's a charade!
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

McCarthy threatens to boycott House Jan. 6 committee after Pelosi rejects two of his GOP picksPelosi rejects two Republicans for Jan. 6 committee. Republicans say they will not participate unless she reverses the decision.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Pelosi vetoes Banks, Jordan for Jan. 6 select committeeLiz Cheney told reporters that she agreed with Nancy Pelosi's veto, adding that “at every opportunity, the minority leader has attempted to prevent the American people from understanding what happened' on Jan. 6. NoOneIsNotThere She would love nothing more than proving DonaldTrump was at the center of this and I support her 100% on that. Thank you RepLizCheney Look im not a super Fan of Liz but I totally respect her for her loyalty to the constitution and our Democracy.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

McCarthy says Republicans will pull out of Jan. 6 committee unless Pelosi reverses decisionU.S. House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy on Wednesday threatened to pull Republicans out of the committee probing the Jan. 6 Capitol attack unless House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reverses her rejection of two lawmakers he appointed to the panel. Pull out? They were never in! GOP is good at pulling out 👋 byeeeee
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Pelosi Rejects Two GOP Picks for Jan. 6 Capitol Riot PanelSpeaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of five Republicans, Reps. Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, from serving on the panel investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot JayEmme00 Thank you Madam Speaker! SpeakerPelosi NoCarnivalBarkingClowns These two are likely heavily involved in what already is being investigated. These two do not speak the truth and only try to create confusion and create false narrative for their ignorant base. Committee would do good work without these two. Kudos to Pelosi for good judgement. Pelosi doesn’t say no to everything
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »