varies from state to state and, in many cases, people may have been convicted of a “violent crime” without committing an act involving physical violence.) With growing efforts to reduce the sentences of people convicted of nonviolent crimes, more focus will have to be spent on rehabilitating those incarcerated for violent crimes.
First, the incarcerated would have to meet the same eligibility requirements for Pell Grants as traditional students. Only the most impoverished individuals can access these grants; incarcerated students with personal or familial financial means would not qualify. in incarceration costs alone. This is likely an underestimate, since it does not include other direct and indirect costs of crime or potential benefits of educating prisoners, such as increased economic output.
On account of the potential cost-savings and public safety benefits, it is clear that federal policymakers of both parties should support reinstating Pell Grants. State policymakers, too, should look for ways to expand educational offerings within state and local correctional systems.
We see this in so many walks of life: education. How about, as a nation, we stop denigrating and belittling education and go back to seeking its benefits. Win-win.
Better pass this on to leftist states like NY which just 'catch n release' criminals so the can commit more crimes.
What a great plan! Education opens doors on so many levels.
Agreed... perhaps a better term would be job training. Here is a study by the Hamilton Project of Brookings:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: enews - 🏆 466. / 52 Read more »
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »